Intuitive Ethics and Political Orientations: Testing Moral Foundations as a Theory of Political Ideology
Intuitive Ethics and Political Orientations: Testing Moral Foundations as a Theory of Political Ideology
复制标题
直觉伦理与政治取向：检验作为政治意识形态理论的道德基础
DOI：
10.1111/ajps.12255
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
P. Hatemi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kevin B. Smith;J. Alford;John R. Hibbing;N. Martin;P. Hatemi
道德基础理论(MFT)最初是为了解释道德判断中的文化差异而发展起来的，后来被广泛用作政治意识形态的理论。MFT假设，政治态度植根于天生的心理模块产生的本能评估，这些模块是为了解决社会困境而进化出来的。如果这是正确的，道德基础必须是相对稳定的性格特征，道德基础的变化应该系统地预测政治方向的后续变化，至少部分道德基础必须是可遗传的。我们测试了这些假设，发现随着时间的推移，个人层面的道德基础存在很大的变异性，几乎没有证据表明这些变化可以解释政治态度的变化。我们还发现，几乎没有证据表明道德基础是可遗传的。这些发现对MFT作为一种意识形态理论的未来提出了质疑。
Originally developed to explain cultural variation in moral judgments, moral foundations theory (MFT) has become widely adopted as a theory of political ideology. MFT posits that political attitudes are rooted in instinctual evaluations generated by innate psychological modules evolved to solve social dilemmas. If this is correct, moral foundations must be relatively stable dispositional traits, changes in moral foundations should systematically predict consequent changes in political orientations, and, at least in part, moral foundations must be heritable. We test these hypotheses and find substantial variability in individual-level moral foundations across time, and little evidence that these changes account for changes in political attitudes. We also find little evidence that moral foundations are heritable. These findings raise questions about the future of MFT as a theory of ideology.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
J. Krosnick;D. Alwin
通讯作者：
J. Krosnick;D. Alwin
测试人格遗传结构模型：克隆格和艾森克人格系统的比较。
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Heath,AC;Cloninger,CR;Martin,NG
通讯作者：
Martin,NG