What is the best reference state for building statistical potentials in RNA 3D structure evaluation?
What is the best reference state for building statistical potentials in RNA 3D structure evaluation?
复制标题
在 RNA 3D 结构评估中构建统计势的最佳参考状态是什么?
DOI:
10.1261/rna.069872.118
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Tan Zhi-Jie
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tan Ya-Lan;Feng Chen-Jie;Jin Lei;Shi Ya-Zhou;Zhang Wenbing;Tan Zhi-Jie
Knowledge-based statistical potentials have been shown to be efficient in protein structure evaluation/prediction, and the core difference between various statistical potentials is attributed to the choice of reference states. However, for RNA 3D structure evaluation, a comprehensive examination on reference states is still lacking. In this work, we built six statistical potentials based on six reference states widely used in protein structure evaluation, including averaging, quasi-chemical approximation, atom-shuffled, finite-ideal-gas, spherical-noninteracting, and random-walk-chain reference states, and we examined the six reference states against three RNA test sets including six subsets. Our extensive examinations show that, overall, for identifying native structures and ranking decoy structures, the finite-ideal-gas and random-walk-chain reference states are slightly superior to others, while for identifying near-native structures, there is only a slight difference between these reference states. Our further analyses show that the performance of a statistical potential is apparently dependent on the quality of the training set. Furthermore, we found that the performance of a statistical potential is closely related to the origin of test sets, and for the three realistic test subsets, the six statistical potentials have overall unsatisfactory performance. This work presents a comprehensive examination on the existing reference states and statistical potentials for RNA 3D structure evaluation.