Why movement comes for free once you have adjunction
Why movement comes for free once you have adjunction
复制标题
为什么一旦有了辅助服务就可以免费移动
DOI：
10.1075/la.34.04mar
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
Thomas Graf
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Thomas Graf
名词短语在句子中占据论元位置(或承担语法关系或功能)是由于它们相对于谓词所起的语义作用，这是很好的理解。当前的原则和参数理论，在Chomsky(1981)之后，增加了一个关于许可NP(DP)论元的附加条件：它们也必须被指派(抽象)格。最近对具有丰富的形态格和一致系统的语言的研究有力地表明，抽象格和形态格与一致的关系充其量是间接的。本文认为，对形态格的正确处理必须彻底打破抽象格与形态格之间的界限。我认为“Burzio的概括”(Burzio‘s Generation)(Burzio’s Generation)所涵盖的事实被分成了两套，由独立动机的原则来解释。其中一套是“扩展投射原则”(见乔姆斯基1986：4)，特别是句子必须有主语的要求。其余部分通过正确的“宾格”和“作格”形态格的普遍刻画来处理，这一刻画也成功地解释了作格格分布的一个特殊事实。赋予形态格理论以内容，可以将抽象格论从句法理论中剔除。语义角色和论元位置之间的映射，加上扩展投射原则的主语要求，足以许可论元位置上的NP。
It is fairly well understood that noun phrases (or DPs) occupy argument positions in sentences (or bear grammatical relations or functions) by virtue of the semantic roles they bear with respect to predicates. Current Principles and Parameters theories, following Chomsky (1981), add an additional condition on licensing NP (DP) arguments: they must also be assigned (abstract) Case. Recent investigations of languages with rich morphological case and agreement systems strongly indicate that the relationship between abstract Case and morphological case and agreement is indirect, at best. In this paper, I argue that the proper treatment of morphological case necessitates a complete break between abstract Case and morphological case. I show that the facts covered by “Burzio’s generalization”(Burzio 1986) split into two sets explained by independently motivated principles. One set is covered by the “Extended Projection Principle”(see, eg, Chomsky 1986: 4), in particular the requirement that sentences have subjects. The remainder is handled by the correct universal characterization of “accusative” and “ergative” morphological case, a characterization that also successfully explains a peculiar fact about the distribution of ergative case. Giving content to the theory of morphological case allows for the elimination of abstract Case theory from the theory of syntax. The mapping between semantic roles and argument positions, augmented by the subject requirement of the Extended Projection Principle, is suffi cient to license NPs in argument positions.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
FG 2019
影响因子：
--
作者：
De Santo, Aniello;Graf, Thomas
通讯作者：
Graf, Thomas