Adolescents' reasoning about exclusion from social groups
Adolescents' reasoning about exclusion from social groups
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037//0012-1649.39.1.71
复制
发表时间：
2003-01-01
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Horn, SS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Horn, SS
九年级和十一年级的学生（N = 379）接受了一项调查，内容是他们对仅仅根据某人或她的社会参照群体成员资格而将某人排除在社会群体之外的评价。个体在模棱两可和非模棱两可的情况下评估排斥性，将排斥性的判断和推理与更典型的道德情况（拒绝资源）的判断和推理进行比较。总的来说，参与者认为排斥比拒绝资源更错误，并且使用更少的道德和更多的传统理由来证明。他们的判断。参与者在评估模糊情境时更多地依赖于群体知识或刻板印象，而在评估非模糊情境时更多地依赖于个人知识。在评价、推理和使用刻板印象方面也发现了与年龄和性别相关的差异。
Ninth- and 11th-grade students (N = 379) were surveyed regarding their evaluations of excluding someone from a social group solely on the basis of his of her social reference group membership. Individuals evaluated exclusion in ambiguous and nonambiguous situations, judgments and reasoning about exclusion were compared with judgments and reasoning about a more prototypically moral situation (denial of resources). Overall, participants evaluated exclusion as less wrong than denial of resources and used fewer moral and more conventional reasons to justify. their judgments. Participants relied more on their group knowledge or stereotypes in evaluating ambiguous situations and more on their personal knowledge in evaluating nonambiguous situations. Age- and gender-related differences in evaluations, reasoning, and use of stereotypes were also found.