Effects of a saliva test pipeline procedure on adolescent self-reported alcohol use.
Effects of a saliva test pipeline procedure on adolescent self-reported alcohol use.
复制标题
唾液测试管道程序对青少年自我报告的饮酒情况的影响。
DOI：
10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb00803.x
复制
发表时间：
1993
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Perry,CL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wagenaar,AC;Komro,KA;McGovern,P;Williams,CL;Perry,CL
通过学校问卷、电话调查和家庭访谈收集的关于酒精使用的自我报告是酒精领域许多研究的核心指标。这种自我报告的有效性仍然是一个问题。使用生物管道程序是提高自我报告质量的一种方法。目前的研究测试了唾液测试管道程序在提高六年级和八年级青少年饮酒披露率方面的有效性。从14所小学（n = 828）和8所中学（n = 754）各选择了两个六年级班。每个学校的一半班级被分配到管道条件下，另一半被分配到控制条件下。在完成所有学生（管道和控制）收到的问卷调查之前，要求管道条件下的每个学生通过牙辊提供唾液样本。管道学生被告知，“我们今天收集的一些唾液将在实验室进行测试，并将提供酒精使用的生物测量。”接触酒精程序的六年级和八年级学生报告酒精使用率比对照组学生高5%至7%。虽然改善报告的模式在四个酒精使用指标和两个年级水平上保持不变，但只有一个指标的效果具有统计学意义。这里使用的管道程序对青少年自我报告的酒精使用影响很小。
Self‐reports on alcohol use collected via school‐based questionnaires, telephone surveys, and household interviews are central measures in many studies in the alcohol field. The validity of such self‐reports remains an issue. Use of biological pipeline procedures is one way in which the quality of self‐reports might be improved. The current study tested the effectiveness of a saliva test pipeline procedure in increasing drinking disclosure rates among adolescents in the sixth and eighth grades. Two sixth‐grade classes from each of 14 elementary schools (n = 828) and four eighth‐grade classes from each of 8 middle schools (n = 754) were selected. Half of the classes in each school were assigned to the pipeline condition and half to the control condition. Each student in the pipeline condition was asked to provide a saliva sample via dental roll before completing a questionnaire that all students (pipeline and control) received. Pipeline students were told that “some of the saliva we collect today will be tested in a laboratory and will provide a biological measure of alcohol use.” Sixth‐ and eighth‐grade students exposed to the alcohol procedure reported 5 to 7% higher alcohol use prevalences than students in the control group. While the pattern of improved reporting tinder the pipeline condition held across four alcohol‐use measures and two grade levels, the effect was statistically significant for only one measure. The pipeline procedures used here had small effects on adolescent self‐reported alcohol use.