Community resilience, social capital and territorial governance
Community resilience, social capital and territorial governance
复制标题
DOI：
10.4422/ager.2015.08
复制
发表时间：
2015-01-01
影响因子：
1
通讯作者：
Shucksmith, Mark
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cheshire, Lynda;Esparcia, Javier;Shucksmith, Mark
社区复原力构成了理解农村地区面临的风险和变化的概念框架。然而，不同的范式和学科影响了其特定方向的发展。一路走来，最初在自然科学中提出的概念逐渐受到社会科学的热烈欢迎，并被运用到社区和社会资本等已经存在争议的概念中，作为解释什么应该具有韧性、促进韧性的条件和资源以及衡量韧性的方法的一种方式。但这并不是毫无问题地发生的，我们有理由对将韧性思维不加批判地应用于社会系统和环境持谨慎态度。此外，虽然这一系列的兴趣在于农村社区复原力的概念，但重要的是要注意，这个术语并没有什么独特的农村特征，因为它也被城市环境所采用，可以说更加热情。那么，值得一问的是，农村社区复原力的理论、政策和实践有何独特之处（如果有的话），以及农村研究学者以何种方式为超越农村空间直接背景的复原力辩论做出贡献。
The community resilience constitutes a conceptual framework for understanding the risks and changes that rural regions face. Nevertheless different paradigms and disciplines have influenced its development in particular directions. Along the way, what was initially formulated in the natural sciences has come to be embraced enthusiastically by the social sciences and harnessed to already contested concepts, such as community and social capital, as a way of explicating what should be resilient, the conditions and resources thought to foster resilience, and the ways in which resilience can be measured. But this has not occurred unproblematically and there are reasons to be cautious about the uncritical application of resilience thinking to social systems and contexts. Further, while the interest of this collection lies in the concept of rural community resilience, it is important to be mindful that there is nothing uniquely rural about the term since it has also been adopted in the urban context, arguably with even more fervour. It is worth asking, then, what, if anything, is distinct about the theory, policy and practice of rural community resilience and in what ways do rural studies scholars make a contribution to resilience debates that go beyond the immediate setting of rural spaces.