RESPONSE RATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF RESPONSE TOPOGRAPHY IN EYELID CONDITIONING UNDER DIFFERENT CONDITIONS OF REINFORCEMENT
RESPONSE RATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF RESPONSE TOPOGRAPHY IN EYELID CONDITIONING UNDER DIFFERENT CONDITIONS OF REINFORCEMENT
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/h0037169
复制
发表时间：
1974-01-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
GRANT, DA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
HELLIGE, JB;GRANT, DA
在两个实验中，共有92名大学生被分为自愿（V）和条件（C）反应的基础上，他们的主要眼睑反应地形。反应率和发展的非条件刺激（UCS）衰减眼睑反应地形图，然后检查在连续经典强化，仪器回避强化，和轭间歇经典强化。一般而言，Vs显示出比Cs更好的UC衰减响应形貌。在连续和间歇性喷气强化的经典条件反射期间，Vs在试验块上形成了UC衰减反应地形，但在仪器回避条件反射期间则不然。虽然工具回避Cs比他们的轭对应谁收到间歇性经典强化更多的反应，Vs显示完全相反的顺序。结果进行了讨论，在不同模式的强化反应学习过程中，响应学习的差异，在Vs和Cs，和可能的差异Vs和Cs在其经典的条件反射参数。(17参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
In 2 experiments, a total of 92 undergraduates were classified as voluntary (V) and conditioned (C) responders based on their predominant eyelid response topography. Response rate and development of an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) attenuating eyelid response topography were then examined during continuous classical reinforcement, instrumental avoidance reinforcement, and yoked intermittent classical reinforcement. In general, the Vs showed a better UCS-attenuating response topography than the Cs. The Vs developed the UCS-attenuating response topography over trial blocks during classical conditioning with both continuous and intermittent airpuff reinforcement, but not during instrumental avoidance conditioning. While the instrumental avoidance Cs gave more responses than their yoked counterparts who received intermittent classical reinforcement, the Vs showed exactly the reverse ordering. Results are discussed in terms of response learning processes during different modes of reinforcement, response learning differences in Vs and Cs, and possible differences between Vs and Cs in their classical conditioning parameters.(17 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)