Impact of farmer households' livelihood assets on their options of economic compensation patterns for cultivated land protection
Impact of farmer households' livelihood assets on their options of economic compensation patterns for cultivated land protection
复制标题
农户生计资产对耕地保护经济补偿模式选择的影响
DOI：
10.1007/s11442-014-1091-5
复制
发表时间：
2014-04-01
影响因子：
4.9
通讯作者：
Wang Liping
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Li Guangdong;Fang Chuanglin;Wang Liping
随着城市化进程的加快和社会经济的转型，耕地保护问题逐渐成为我国关注的焦点。经济补偿在促进耕地保护、提高耕地利用率方面起着至关重要的作用。农户满意度对补偿效果有很大影响。因此，农户选择耕地保护经济补偿方式的意愿被考虑和重新审视。采用逐步农村评价法（PRA），对重庆市梅萨山区3个自然村392户居民进行了抽样调查。在此基础上，构建了农户生计六边形的定量分析框架，对不同农户的生计资产进行了定量分析。最后，运用灰色关联模型和Probit回归模型探讨了农户生计资产与补偿模式选择之间的耦合关系。研究结果表明，农户生计资产存在着质量和空间异质性。我们发现，生计资产的不平等是明显的五个家庭类型。在空间上呈现出海拔越高，生计资产越少的趋势。另外，由于生计资产的不同和区位的差异，他们对经济补偿模式的选择也有不同，从成都模式到佛山模式。具体而言，农户生计资产与其补偿模式之间存在耦合关系，自然资产价值与农户模式选择呈负相关，其他生计资产对补偿模式有不同程度的正向影响，从高到低依次为心理资产、人力资产、物质资产、金融资产和社会资产。根据农户生计资产短缺的特点，设计了概念性的补偿模式体系。提出了补偿方法、补偿标准、补偿依据和补偿资金来源。
With rapid urbanization and the socio-economic transformation, cultivated land protection has gradually become a major concern in China. The economic compensation plays a crucial role in promoting cultivated land protection and improving the utilization ratio of cultivated land. Farmer household's satisfaction has a great influence on the effectiveness of compensation. Therefore, households' willingness to select the economic compensation pattern for cultivated land protection has been considered and re-examined. By employing Participatory Rural Appraisal method (PRA), 3 villages and 392 households were investigated and sampled in mesa and hilly areas of Chongqing. Then a quantitative analysis framework of household livelihood hexagon has been developed to quantify the livelihood assets of different farmer households. Finally, the Gray Relation Model and Probit Regression Model have been employed to explore the coupling relationship between the household livelihood assets and their compensation pattern options. The results show that there are both qualitative and spatial heterogeneity in household livelihood assets. We found that the inequality of livelihood assets is evident for five household types. There is a spatial trend that the higher the elevation, the less livelihood assets are. In addition, their options of economic compensation pattern vary from Chengdu Pattern to Foshan Pattern due to their difference in livelihood assets and difference in location. In detail, there is a coupling relationship between household livelihood assets and their compensation pattern; negative correlation is observed between natural assets value and household pattern options, while the other livelihood assets have positive impacts on compensation pattern in varying degrees, which from the top are psychological assets, human assets, physical assets, financial assets, and social assets respectively. A conceptual compensation pattern system has been designed to meet the demands for farmer households mainly according to their shortage in livelihood assets. In addition, compensation method, compensation standard, the basis of compensation and the source of compensation funds have been proposed accordingly.