THE MECHANISMS OF NAMING
THE MECHANISMS OF NAMING
复制标题
DOI：
10.1017/s0140525x00045763
复制
发表时间：
1985-12-01
影响因子：
29.3
通讯作者：
FORSTER, KI
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
FORSTER, KI
双路径理论是最流行和最有影响力的词处理理论之一，它认为有两种功能独立的词处理方法，一种涉及词汇知识的获取，另一种涉及非词汇的形素到音素的转换。与这一理论密切相关的三个主题是非词的加工，拼写规则效应，以及阅读在选择性损害任一途径后可能受损的方式。本文评估了这些主题的证据，并在每一种情况下，一个独立的非词汇处理路线的理论的索赔被称为问题。这一结论进一步支持的语言限制，限制任何非词汇的字形音素转换过程的讨论。一些替代方法的视觉文字处理，其中共享的假设，词汇知识可以引导组装的语音信息，进行了讨论。有人认为，这些方法应该指导未来的研究。
One of the most popular and influential theories of word processing, dual-route theory, proposes that there are two functionally independent means of processing words, one involving access to lexical knowledge and the other involving nonlexical grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. Three topics germane to this theory are the processing of nonwords, spelling regularity effects, and the manner in which reading may be impaired following selective damage to either route. This paper evaluates evidence on these topics, and in each case the claims of the theory for an independent nonlexical processing route are called into question. This conclusion is further supported by a discussion of the linguistic constraints that limit any nonlexical grapheme-phoneme conversion process. Some alternative approaches to visual word processing, which share the assumption that lexical knowledge can guide the assembly of phonological information, are discussed. It is argued that these approaches should direct future research.