Erectile responses among heterosexual child molesters, father-daughter incest offenders, and matched non-offenders; five distinct age preference profiles

Erectile responses among heterosexual child molesters, father-daughter incest offenders, and matched non-offenders; five distinct age preference profiles
复制标题

异性恋儿童猥亵者、父女乱伦犯罪者和匹配的非犯罪者的勃起反应;

DOI:
10.1037/h0079791
复制
发表时间:
1989
期刊:
Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
W. Marshall
W. Marshall
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
H. Barbaree;W. Marshall

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

研究人员在21名乱伦犯、40名非家族性儿童猥亵犯和22名社会经济地位、智力和年龄大致匹配的非侵犯者中研究了年龄在3-24岁之间的裸体女性的勃起反应。勃起反应的概况,绘制完全勃起超过目标刺激年龄的百分比,为每个单独的受试者绘制。这些轮廓被法官和后来的计算机可靠地分类为五种不同的轮廓形状,反映出:(1)无法区分刺激;或者明确选择(2)成人,(3)成人和青少年,(4)儿童,或(5)儿童和成人。非罪犯主要表现出“成人”特征,而乱伦罪犯要么表现出不歧视的特征,要么表现出“成人”偏好模式。非家族性儿童猥亵者组具有异质性,该组成员分布在五种轮廓形状中。与其他罪犯相比,显示“儿童”形象的罪犯报告了更多的受害者,并且发现他们在最近的犯罪中使用了更大程度的武力。此外,被归类为“儿童”类别的罪犯的社会经济地位低于成人类别的罪犯。
Erectile responses to pictures of nude females ranging in age from 3-24 years were studied in a group of 21 incest offenders, 40 non-familial child molesters, and a group of 22 non-offender subjects approximately matched on socioeconomic status, intelligence, and age. Profiles of erectile responses, plotting percent of full erection over age of target stimulus, were drawn for each individual subject. These profiles were sorted reliably by judges, and later by computer, into five distinct profile shapes reflecting: (1) a failure to discriminate among the stimuli; or a clear preference for either (2) adults, (3) adults and teens, (4) children, or (5) children and adults. Non-offenders primarily showed 'adult' profiles, while incest offenders displayed either a non-discriminating profile or an 'adult' preference pattern. The non-familial child molester group was heterogeneous in that members of this group were distributed among the five profile shapes. Offenders who displayed a 'child' profile reported a greater number of victims and were found to have used a greater degree of force in the commission of their most recent offence compared with other offenders. Further, offenders whose profiles were classified in the 'child' profile group were lower in socioeconomic status than offenders in the adult profile category.