Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the "porcupine problem"
Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the "porcupine problem"
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.42
复制
发表时间：
2007-01-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Schaller, Mark
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Maner, Jon K.;DeWall, C. Nathan;Schaller, Mark
来自6个实验的证据支持社会重新连接假说，该假说假定社会排斥的经历增加了与新的潜在联系来源建立社会联系的动机。社会排斥的威胁导致参与者对结交新朋友表现出更大的兴趣，增加他们与他人合作的愿望，对新的社会目标形成更积极的印象，并为新的互动伙伴分配更多的奖励。研究结果还表明潜在的边界条件的社会重新连接假说。被排斥的人似乎并不寻求与特定的排斥者或与新的合作伙伴，没有面对面的互动是预期的重新连接。此外，恐惧的负面评价缓和的反应，以排斥，参与者低的恐惧的负面评价作出反应，以亲和的方式，新的互动伙伴，而参与者高的恐惧的负面评价没有。
Evidence from 6 experiments supports the social reconnection hypothesis, which posits that the experience of social exclusion increases the motivation to forge social bonds with new sources of potential affiliation. Threat of social exclusion led participants to express greater interest in making new friends, to increase their desire to work with others, to form more positive impressions of novel social targets, and to assign greater rewards to new interaction partners. Findings also suggest potential boundary conditions to the social reconnection hypothesis. Excluded individuals did not seem to seek reconnection with the specific perpetrators of exclusion or with novel partners with whom no face-to-face interaction was anticipated. Furthermore, fear of negative evaluation moderated responses to exclusion such that participants low in fear of negative evaluation responded to new interaction partners in an affiliative fashion, whereas participants high in fear of negative evaluation did not.