Understanding the Role of Additive Manufacturing Knowledge in Stimulating Design Innovation for Novice Designers
Understanding the Role of Additive Manufacturing Knowledge in Stimulating Design Innovation for Novice Designers
复制标题
了解增材制造知识在刺激新手设计师设计创新中的作用
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Y. Zhao
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sheng Yang;T. Page;Y. Zhao
增材制造（AM）被认为是一种颠覆性技术，为创新设计提供了巨大的潜力。先前的实验研究表明，与对照组相比，提供AM知识（AMK）资源的新手设计师可以产生更高数量和质量的解决方案。然而，这些研究采用了粗粒度的评估指标，在将AMK与激进或架构创新联系起来方面存在不足。这一缺陷直接影响到AMK的捕获、建模和交付，因此在构思阶段可以更有效地利用新的机会。为了更好地理解AMK在促进设计创新中的作用，我们对两个设计项目进行了实验研究：(a)混合器设计项目，(b)吹风机重新设计项目。前者旨在发现AMK灵感是否增加了工作原理（WP）的数量和新颖性（即突破性创新），后者则考察了AMK对布局和特征新颖性（即建筑创新）的影响。实验研究表明，如果AMK在功能上与设计问题无关，则AMK对建筑创新的影响是非常有限的。提出了两种策略来帮助构思过程最大化识别AM潜力的可能性，以促进激进的创新。讨论了本研究的局限性和未来的研究计划。
Additive manufacturing (AM) is recognized as a disruptive technology that offers significant potentials for innovative design. Prior experimental studies have revealed that novice designers provided with AM knowledge (AMK) resources can generate a higher quantity and quality of solutions in contrast with control groups. However, these studies have adopted coarse-grain evaluation metrics that fall short in correlating AMK with radical or architectural innovation. This deficiency directly affects the capturing, modeling, and delivering AMK so that novel opportunities may be more efficiently utilized in ideation stage. To refine the understanding of AMK's role in stimulating design innovation, an experimental study is conducted with two design projects: (a) a mixer design project, and (b) a hairdryer redesign project. The former of which aims to discover whether AMK inspiration increases the quantity and novelty of working principles (WP) (i.e., radical innovation), while the latter examines the influence of AMK on layout and feature novelty (i.e., architectural innovation). The experimental study indicates that AMK does have a positive influence on architectural innovation while the effects on radical innovation are very limited if the example illustrating the AMK is functionally irrelevant to the design problem. Two strategies are proposed to aid the ideation process in maximizing the possibility of identifying AM potentials to facilitate radical innovation. The limitations of this study and future research plans are discussed.
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.876
发表时间：
2007-09
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
Jarrod Moss;K. Kotovsky;J. Cagan
通讯作者：
Jarrod Moss;K. Kotovsky;J. Cagan