Impact of cigarette smoking and vaping on the outcome of full-mouth ultrasonic scaling among patients with gingival inflammation: a prospective study
Impact of cigarette smoking and vaping on the outcome of full-mouth ultrasonic scaling among patients with gingival inflammation: a prospective study
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s00784-018-2725-2
复制
发表时间：
2019-06-01
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Javed, Fawad
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
ALHarthi, Shatha Subhi;BinShabaib, Munerah;Javed, Fawad
目前尚无研究评估吸烟者（CS）（第1组）、电子烟（E-cigs）（第2组）和从不吸烟者（NS）（第3组）对全口超声刮治（FSUS）的口腔软组织反应。的目的是评估吸烟和vaping对牙周组织的影响FMUS.Materials和MethodsIn临床前瞻性研究，89名男性被分为三组：CS（组1），电子烟用户（组2），NS（组3）。使用问卷来收集关于CS和vaping的持续时间和每日频率的人口统计数据和信息。分别于术前、术后3个月和6个月测量全口菌斑指数（PI）、探诊出血（BOP）、临床附着丧失（AL）和探诊深度（PD）。缺失牙齿（MT）的数量也recorded.ResultsIn组1，2，和3，30，28，和31个人，分别被列入。在第1组中，与基线和3个月随访相比，6个月随访时的平均PI和PD以及PD 4 mm的部位数量无统计学显著差异。第2组和第3组随访3个月（P>0.05）和6个月（P>0.05）时PI、BOP和PD无显著差异。在第2组和第3组中，在3个月和6个月随访时没有PD 4 mm的囊袋。MT的数量没有差异，所有组中没有一个人表现出临床AL. Conclusionfmus后，与电子烟和NS相比，CS中的牙龈炎症更严重。临床相关性牙周炎参数在吸烟者中比电子烟和从不吸烟者更差。然而，对这些发现的解释应极为谨慎，因为许多因素可能影响了目前的结果。
ObjectivesThere are no studies that have assessed the oral soft tissue response to full-mouth ultrasonic scaling (FMUS) among cigarette-smokers (CS) (group 1), individuals vaping electronic-cigarettes (E-cigs) (group 2), and never-smokers (NS) (group 3). The aim was to assess the impact of cigarette smoking and vaping on periodontal tissues following FMUS.Materials and methodsIn a clinical prospective study, 89 male individuals were divided into three groups: CS (group 1), E-cig users (group 2), and NS (group 3). A questionnaire was used to gather demographic data and information regarding duration and daily frequency of CS and vaping. Full-mouth plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), clinical attachment loss (AL), and probing depth (PD) were measured at baseline and 3 and 6months after FMUS (without root surface debridement). Numbers of missing teeth (MT) were also recorded.ResultsIn groups 1, 2, and 3, 30, 28, and 31 individuals, respectively were included. In group 1, there was no statistically significant difference in mean PI and PD and numbers of sites with PD4mm at 6 months' follow-up compared with baseline and 3 months' follow-up. In groups 2 and 3, there was no significant difference in PI, BOP, and PD at 3 months' (P>0.05) and 6-months' (P>0.05) follow-up. There were no pockets with PD4mm at 3 and 6months' follow-up in groups 2 and 3. There was no difference in the numbers of MT and none of the individuals exhibited clinical AL in all groups.ConclusionFollowing FMUS, gingival inflammation is worse in CS compared with individuals vaping E-cigs and NS.Clinical relevancePeriodontal inflammatory parameters are worse in cigarette-smokers than individuals vaping electronic cigarettes and never-smokers following FMUS. However, these findings should be interpreted with extreme caution as a number of factors may have influenced the present results.