Do recent US Supreme Court rulings on patenting of genes and genetic diagnostics affect the practice of genetic screening and diagnosis in prenatal and reproductive care?
Do recent US Supreme Court rulings on patenting of genes and genetic diagnostics affect the practice of genetic screening and diagnosis in prenatal and reproductive care?
复制标题
美国最高法院最近关于基因和基因诊断专利的裁决是否会影响产前和生殖保健中基因筛查和诊断的实践?
DOI:
10.1002/pd.4445
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
VandenVeyver,IgnatiaB
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chandrasekharan,Subhashini;McGuire,AmyL;VandenVeyver,IgnatiaB
Thousands of patents have been awarded that claim human gene sequences and their uses, and some have been challenged in court. In a recent high‐profile case,Association for Molecular Pathology, et al.v.Myriad Genetics, Inc.,et al., the US Supreme Court ruled that genes are natural occurring substances and therefore not patentable through ‘composition of matter’ claims. The consequences of this ruling will extend well beyond ending Myriad's monopoly overBRCAtesting and may affect similar monopolies of other commercial laboratories for tests involving other genes. It could also simplify intellectual property issues surrounding genome‐wide clinical sequencing, which can generate results for genes covered by intellectual property. Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for common aneuploidies using cell‐free fetal (cff) DNA in maternal blood is currently offered through commercial laboratories and is also the subject of ongoing patent litigation. The recent Supreme Court decision in theMyriadcase has already been invoked by a lower district court in NIPT litigation and resulted in invalidation of primary claims in a patent on currently marketed cffDNA‐based testing for chromosomal aneuploidies. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.