March

March
复制标题

DOI:
10.2307/j.ctv10sm9bp.8
复制
发表时间:
1890-03
期刊:
The Hospital
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Dianne Easterling
Dianne Easterling
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dianne Easterling

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

是关于青少年酒后驾车的片段这让我想起了德里的洛迪殖民地谋杀案,一个享有特权的年轻人,国际军火商的儿子,海军上将的孙子,桑吉夫·南达谋杀了包括两名警察在内的七人,在他身后留下了一片废墟。可悲的是,更糟糕的是,他侥幸逃脱了惩罚,因为他的行为没有得到雄辩的赞扬,他也没有得到足够的抨击。当他的证人变得敌对时,他继续完成了哥伦比亚大学的MBA学位,现在又回到了印度,担任克拉里奇酒店的首席执行官。德里街头的屠夫。我想知道德里人会作何感想。金钱的傲慢。或许我们该问问自己该怪谁。是唯一一个在最后一刻退缩的证人吗?顺便说一句,他已经在南达的一家家族企业工作了。是不是地位很高的朋友认为朋友是需要的,不管做什么都是朋友?或者是那些没有任何智力武器的无能检察官?还是印度的法律的制度本身鼓励对我们道德尊严的冒犯?一个孩子失去父亲的唯一原因是在另一种监狱里。问题是,当你通过法律的系统时,每个人都死了,这一点是没有意义的。这也是印度裔美国人家中经常讨论的一个场景。我能听到他们中的一些人说,“这就是为什么我们不想回去。在这样一个中世纪的法律的社会里抚养我们的孩子?",“这种情况只发生在印度。实际上并没有。辛普森在输掉这场非正常死亡诉讼后,声称“绝对,肯定,100%无罪”,并被迫赔偿3350万美元。他说,如果他必须工作来支付前妻的家人,那么他就不会工作。这位前足球星星一直靠他的NFL养老金和年度年金生活,这两项都是法庭无法触及的。我猜这首歌应该是基奇纳在恩图曼战役胜利前说的,不管发生什么,我们有马克沁机枪,他们没有。
was a snippet on teenage drunken driving. It reminded me of Delhi’s Lodhi Colony Murder case where privileged youngster, son of international arms dealer and grandson of an Admiral, Sanjeev Nanda murdered seven people including two cops, leaving devastation in his wake. Sad as that was, what was even worse was that he got away with it. Given, that he wasn’t praised eloquently for his deeds, he wasn’t given enough flak either. As his witnesses turned hostile he went on to complete his MBA from Columbia University and is now back on the Indian roads as CEO of Claridges Hotels. A butcher back on the streets of Delhi. I wonder how that makes the Delhites feel. The sheer arrogance of money. Maybe we should ask ourselves who was to blame. Was it the only witness, who chickened out at the last minute? By the way, he has been given employment in a Nanda family firm. Was it highly placed friends who believe that a friend is need is a friend indeed, no matter what the deed? Or was it the incompetent prosecutors without any intellectual firepower? Or does the legal system of India itself encourage affronts to our moral decency? The sole reason why a kid is going up fatherless is behind bars of a different kind. The problem is that by the time you’ve gone through the legal system, everyone's dead and the point is moot. It is a scenario often discussed in homes of Indian Americans also. I can just hear some of them say, “This is why we don’t want to go back. Raise our kids in such a medieval legal society?”, “This happens only in India.” Actually it doesn’t. O.J. Simpson, who pleaded, “Absolutely, positively, 100% not guilty” and was forced to make financial reparations of $33.5 Million after losing the wrongful death suit says that if he has to work to pay his ex-wife’s family, then he just won’t work. The former football star has been living off his NFL pension and an annual annuity, both of which cannot be touched by the courts. I guess the Twit anthem would be what Kitchener said before his victory in the Battle of Omdurman, Whatever happens, we have got The Maxim gun and they have not