Spring cleaning: freshening up the portfolio.
Spring cleaning: freshening up the portfolio.
复制标题
春季大扫除：更新投资组合。
DOI：
10.1152/ajpheart.00219.2023
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Brunt,KeithR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lindsey,MerryL;Kassiri,Zamaneh;LeBlanc,AmandaJ;Ripplinger,CrystalM;Kirk,JonathanA;Carter,JasonR;Kleinbongard,Petra;Brunt,KeithR
美国生理学杂志-心脏和37循环生理学(AJP-心脏和循环生理学)的执行编辑委员会不断寻找更好地服务于我们38个科学界的方法。39美国生理学会(APS)其他出版物的主编和副主编以及APS出版团队也有同样的看法。40在过去的六个月里，这个集体小组审查了APS出版公司目前提供的41种文章类型，并进行了更新，以更新我们向我们的作者和42名读者提供的内容。这篇社论的目的是告知作者、审稿人和读者最近对我们的文章类型组合所做的43项更改。主要的变化是将Rapid 44 Report更名为Short Report，并将Innovative Methodology更名为方法和资源。表1列出了45种完整的文章类型以及每种类型的描述。我们还鼓励作者参考APS出版物的作者信息，作为准备投稿的有用资源。(1)48简短报告(以前的快速报告)。此前，快速报告仅限49份提交，这些提交的研究数据具有高度创新性和潜在的高影响力，其中50份以有限的字数和数字格式打包。其目标是传达早期调查结果51，以便为有希望的概念建立动力。我们发现，作者和审稿人都没有很好地把握高创新和高影响力的含义，我们的编辑团队发现，由于预期缺乏清晰度，很难处理这种手稿类型。我们发现有54位作者、审稿人和编辑想要一个更好的选择。我们的作者55报告早期调查结果的需要恰逢科学传播和知识动员56的演变，这预示着一个在线预印本、混合会议、播客和57个数字媒体的时代。58
The executive editorial board of the American Journal of Physiology-Heart and 37 Circulatory Physiology (AJP-Heart and Circ) continually looks for ways to better serve our 38 scientific community. This sentiment is shared by the Editors-in-Chief and Associate Editors of 39 the other American Physiological Society (APS) Publications and by the APS Publications team. 40 Over the past six months, this collective group has reviewed the article types currently offered 41 by APS Publications and has made updates to freshen up what we offer to our authors and 42 readers. The purpose of this editorial is to inform authors, reviewers, and readers on the recent 43 changes made to our article type portfolio. The primary changes are the renaming of the Rapid 44 Report to Short Report and renaming Innovative Methodology to Methods and Resources. The 45 full article types available with a description of each type are listed in Table 1. We also 46 encourage authors to consult the Information for Authors for APS Publications as a helpful 47 resource in preparing a submission.(1) 48Short Report (formerly Rapid Report). Previously, the Rapid Report was limited to 49 submissions that presented research data with high innovation and potentially high impact, 50 packaged in a limited word count and figure format. The goal was to communicate early findings 51 to build momentum for promising concepts. We found that authors and reviewers alike were not 52 well calibrated as to what high innovation and high impact meant, and our editorial team found it 53 difficult to handle this manuscript type due to the lack of clarity for expectations. We found 54 authors, reviewers, and editors were left wanting a better alternative. The need for our authors 55 to report early findings coincides with an evolution in science communication and knowledge 56 mobilization that has heralded an era of online pre-prints, hybrid conferences, podcasts, and 57 digital media. 58