The Tensions Between Academic Freedom and Institutional Review Boards
The Tensions Between Academic Freedom and Institutional Review Boards
复制标题
学术自由与机构审查委员会之间的紧张关系
DOI：
10.1177/1077800406297655
复制
发表时间：
2007
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Zoë Blumberg Corwin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Tierney;Zoë Blumberg Corwin
学术自由和保护人类研究对象是美国大学的核心原则。学术自由保障终身教授自主研究的权利；人类受试者保护确保研究对研究参与者造成的风险尽可能小。虽然这两项原则是相互排斥的，但机构审查委员会管辖权的最近趋势使这两项原则彼此之间的冲突日益增加。本文概述了机构审查委员会可能侵犯学术自由的三种方式：(a)规定谁需要同意研究，(b)规定允许的问题类型和研究互动的地点，以及(c)限制研究设计。
Academic freedom and the protection of human research subjects are central tenets of American universities. Academic freedom protects the rights of tenured professors to conduct autonomous research; human subject protection ensures that research causes as minimal a risk as possible to study participants. Although the two principles are mutually exclusive, recent trends in Institutional Review Board jurisdiction have placed the two principles in increasing conflict with one another. This article outlines three ways in which Institutional Review Boards potentially infringe on academic freedom: (a) by regulating who is required to consent to research, (b) by stipulating the type of questions allowed and location of research interactions, and (c) by limiting research design.