Short‐term effects of organic matter and compaction manipulations on soil temperature, moisture, and soil respiration for 2 years in the Oregon Cascades
Short‐term effects of organic matter and compaction manipulations on soil temperature, moisture, and soil respiration for 2 years in the Oregon Cascades
复制标题
有机质和压实操作对俄勒冈喀斯喀特地区土壤温度、湿度和土壤呼吸的短期影响长达 2 年
DOI:
10.1002/saj2.20485
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Hatten, Jeff A.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gallo, Adrian C.;Holub, Scott M.;Littke, Kim;Lajtha, Kate;Maguire, Doug;Hatten, Jeff A.
Understanding the factors controlling nutrient dynamics can help guide forest management plans to promote their long‐term productivity. We used experimental treatments with three levels of biomass removals and two levels of compaction to monitor the impacts to soil biophysical characteristics in an intensively managed forest. Soil temperature, moisture, and respiration observations began 6 mo after treatment installation completion and continued for 2 yr. Compaction had few consistent significant effects on measured variables, and there were negligible differences in volumetric soil water content between whole tree (WT) and bole only (BO) harvesting. Compared with BO, the 10‐cm average and maximum growing season temperatures in WT significantly increased by 1.2 and 2.5 °C, respectively. The effects of WT removals resulted in whole profile (10–100 cm) increases in the average and maximum growing season soil temperatures. The WT removals resulted in an increase of 1.4 times more soil growing degree days (SGDD) at 10 cm and 1.6 times more at 100 cm compared with BO. Despite favorable temperature and moisture conditions, differences in soil respiration could not be explained by biomass or compaction treatments. The uncut reference forest was consistently cooler and drier, but respired more CO2throughout both years of observation compared with treated areas. The large physical disturbance of forest harvesting on the site likely masked any incremental treatment differences by homogenizing the microbial response in the ensuing 2‐yr study period. Future research should continue to investigate whether these soil biophysical changes influence site productivity or more sensitive indices of soil C dynamics.