Optimum vs. Equilibrium Land Use Pattern and Congestion Toll

Optimum vs. Equilibrium Land Use Pattern and Congestion Toll
复制标题

最佳与平衡土地利用模式和拥堵收费

DOI:
10.2307/3003056
复制
发表时间:
1973
期刊:
The Bell Journal of Economics
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
E. Sheshinski
E. Sheshinski
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Y. Oron;D. Pinés;E. Sheshinski

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文提出了一个城市区域内的最佳和竞争性土地利用模式之间的比较。本文中的均衡概念涉及五个部门:家庭、住房生产者、复合商品生产者、土地交易者和运输当局。本文所指的最优概念是在平等对待平等者的条件下所能实现的最大效用水平。这种最优分配可以通过一个竞争性的价格体系来支持,如果交通管理当局收取必要的拥堵费,并作为一次性补贴进行重新分配。如果收取的拥堵费低于保证的水平,那么竞争性分配就会被扭曲,竞争性城市就会比最优城市更加郊区化。
This paper presents a comparison between optimum and competitive land use patterns within an urban area. The concept of equilibrium in this paper pertains to five sectors: households, housing producers, composite commodity producers, land transactors and transportation authority. The concept of optimum referred to in this paper is the maximum utility level which can be realized provided that equals are treated equally. This optimum allocation can be supported by a competitive price system if a warranted congestion toll is collected by the transportation authority and redistributed as a lump sum subsidy. If less than the warranted congestion toll is collected, the resulting competitive allocation is distorted and then the competitive city tends to be more suburbanized than the optimum city.