Gatekeeping and drinking cultures: how do we talk about drinking?

Gatekeeping and drinking cultures: how do we talk about drinking?
复制标题

把关和饮酒文化:我们如何谈论饮酒?

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Adam Eldridge
Adam Eldridge
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Adam Eldridge

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文探讨了看门人在促进接触关键线人方面的重要性。本文结合笔者从事酒精相关研究的经验,讨论了在与持牌人、保安人员、俱乐部和酒吧经营者进行面谈时遇到的问题。然而,与把看门人理解为固定不变的观点不同,我认为我们需要一种更具流动性和根茎性的模式。他们认为,看门人并不是固定不变的,而是远没有最初看起来那么稳定,他们可以沿着常常令人惊讶的轨迹塑造、开放、告知和重新引导研究过程。延伸这一点,在论文的第二部分,从话语和学科实践的角度探讨守门人。我想知道,话语把关,特别是关于负责任和不负责任饮酒行为的辩论,是如何影响和影响这一领域的研究的。再一次,对把关的更流畅的理解是为了通过复杂的、经常是矛盾的方式来工作,知识是在关于饮酒文化的关键工作中产生、复制和产生的。
This paper examines the importance of gatekeepers in facilitating access to key informants. Using the author’s experience of working in alcohol-related research, the problems in gaining interviews with licensees, security staff and club and bar operators are discussed. However, in a departure from an understanding of gatekeepers as fixed, I argue that we need a more fluid and rhizomatic model. Rather than being fixed, it is argued that gatekeepers are far less stable than first appears and can shape, open up, inform and re-direct the research process along often surprising trajectories. Extending this point, in the second part of the paper, gatekeeping is explored in terms of discursive and disciplinary practices. I ask how discursive gatekeeping, and specifically debates about responsible and irresponsible drinking practices, have shaped and informed research in this area. Again, a more fluid understanding of gatekeeping is developed in order to work through the complex and often contradictory ways that knowledge is produced, reproduced and generated in critical work on drinking cultures.