Evidence for the validity of a sleep habits survey for adolescents

Evidence for the validity of a sleep habits survey for adolescents
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/sleep/26.2.213
复制
发表时间:
2003-03-15
期刊:
影响因子:
5.6
通讯作者:
Martin, JL
Martin, JL
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wolfson, AR;Carskadon, MA;Martin, JL

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

研究目的:通过比较回顾性调查对青少年通常的学校和周末夜间睡眠习惯的描述与日记报告的睡眠模式和随后一周的活动估计的睡眠行为,来检查自我报告的调查对青少年睡眠模式估计的有效性。设计和设置:高中生完成了前2周的睡眠习惯调查,然后佩戴活动记录仪(AMI,Ardsley,NY)8天,同时保持每日睡眠日记。配对t检验评估了调查和日记报告之间以及调查和活动记录仪估计之间的平均差异。皮尔森相关性评估了调查报告与日记报告和腕动计估计的一致程度。(196名女生,106名男生)在年级912从五所高中。结果:学校夜间调查总的睡眠时间和觉醒时间没有不同的睡眠量报告的日记或估计的腕动计;在周末,调查的总睡眠时间和醒来时间分别比用体动记录仪估计的和日记报告的时间长和晚。此外,学校和周末夜间调查变量与日记和体动记录仪变量均显著相关。强度的协会始终大于学校的夜晚的变量比相应的周末晚上variables.Conclusions:研究结果支持的有效性的睡眠习惯调查估计相比,日记和活动。高中生的通常的睡眠/觉醒模式的调查措施的优势和局限性进行了讨论。
Study Objectives: To examine the validity of self-reported survey estimates of sleep patterns in adolescents through a comparison of retrospective survey descriptions of usual school- and weekend-night sleep habits with diary-reported sleep patterns and actigraphically estimated sleep behaviors over a subsequent week.Design and Setting: High school students completed a Sleep Habits Survey about the previous 2 weeks and then wore an actigraph (AMI, Ardsley, NY) for 8 days while keeping a daily sleep diary. Matched-pair t tests assessed average differences between survey and diary reports and between survey and actigraph estimates. Pearson correlations assessed the extent to which survey reports were in agreement with diary reports and actigraphy estimates.Participants: 302 high school students (196 girls, 106 boys) in grades 912 from five high schools.Results: School-night survey total sleep times and wake times did not differ from sleep amounts reported in the diary or estimated by actigraphy; survey bedtimes were slightly earlier, On weekends, survey total sleep times and wake times were longer and later, respectively, than estimated with actigraphy and reported on diaries, Moreover, school- and weekend-night survey variables were significantly correlated both with diary and actigraphy variables. Strengths of the associations were consistently greater for school-night variables than the corresponding weekend-night variables.Conclusions: The findings support the validity of the Sleep Habits Survey estimates in comparison with diary and actigraphy. Strengths and limitations for survey measures of high school students' usual sleep/wake patterns are discussed.