A cross-cultural analysis of the Brief Symptom Inventory-18.

A cross-cultural analysis of the Brief Symptom Inventory-18.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/1099-9809.12.2.367
复制
发表时间:
2006-04-01
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Marotta, Sylvia A
Marotta, Sylvia A
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Asner-Self, Kimberly K;Schreiber, James B;Marotta, Sylvia A

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

简明症状量表-18(BSI-18:Derogatis,2000)是9个维度、53项BSI(Derogatis,1993)的缩写版本,BSI是90项症状自评量表-90-修订版(SCL-90-R:Derogatis,1994)的缩写形式。批评集中在因素结构(参见。Boulet & Boss,1991; Ruiperez,Ibanez,Lorente,摩罗,& Ortet,2001)以及两个较旧版本的判别效度较差,表明量表的有用性仅限于整体评分。采用主成分分析法,以100名中美洲移民为研究对象,探讨了BSI - 18的三维因子结构。结果表明,一个潜在的因素,最好用在总的一般筛选的整体水平的心理困扰。讨论了文化差异。
The Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18: Derogatis, 2000) is an abbreviated version of the nine dimension, 53-item BSI (Derogatis, 1993) which is a shortened form of the 90-item Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R: Derogatis, 1994). Criticism focused on factor structure (cf. Boulet & Boss, 1991; Ruiperez, Ibanez, Lorente, Moro, & Ortet, 2001) and the two older versions' poor discriminant validity suggest the scales' usefulness is limited to global scores only. Using principal component analysis, the authors explore the three-dimension factor structure of the BSI - 18 with the understudied population of Central American immigrants to the U.S. (N = 100). Results suggest one underlying factor best used in aggregate as a general screening for overall levels of psychological distress. Cultural differences are discussed.