An ERP study of the processing of response conflict in a dynamic localization task: The role of individual differences in task-appropriate behavior
An ERP study of the processing of response conflict in a dynamic localization task: The role of individual differences in task-appropriate behavior
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.clinph.2010.03.009
复制
发表时间:
2010-08-01
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Gibbons, Henning
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fritzsche, Anna-Sophia;Stahl, Jutta;Gibbons, Henning
Objective: The study aimed at finding specific conflict-sensitive ERP components in a novel dynamic localization task. It was investigated whether these ERP components are sensitive to individual differences in task-appropriate behavior.Methods: Forty-four participants performed a localization task employing three differentially conflict-inducing experimental conditions: a frequent standard condition (O = target, X = distractor), a rare conflict condition (S = target, O = distractor), and a rare control condition (S = target, X = distractor).Results: Behavioral data revealed increases of RT and error percent in the conflict condition. Early frequency-sensitive components P3a and fronto-central N2, and late conflict-sensitive components left-central N2, P3b, and CRN were observed. Two groups of participants were selected, those responding fast and accurately, and those responding slowly and inaccurately. Interestingly, the left-central N2 correlate of conflict was observed in the first group, whereas the CRN correlate was observed in the latter group.Conclusions: Findings suggest that pre-response conflict monitoring is required to successfully complete the task, whereas post-response conflict monitoring did not seem to improve performance.Significance: The present study used a novel dynamic localization task to identify ERP components that were sensitive to response conflict, but differentially predictive of good vs. poor task performance. (C) 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.