A systematic review of the prevalence of sedentary behavior during the after-school period among children aged 5-18 years.

A systematic review of the prevalence of sedentary behavior during the after-school period among children aged 5-18 years.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/s12966-016-0419-1
复制
发表时间:
2016-08-22
期刊:
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hinkley T
Hinkley T
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Arundell L;Fletcher E;Salmon J;Veitch J;Hinkley T

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

独立于身体活动水平,青少年久坐行为(SB)对健康有负面影响。一天中任意时段的SB患病率估计(例如,(d)在放学后,告知需要有针对性的特定时期的干预措施。本系统性综述旨在确定儿童和青少年在放学后的SB患病率。2015年10月进行了计算机检索(2015年11月分析)。入选标准为:发表在同行评议的英文期刊上;参与者年龄为5-18岁;客观地测量总体放学后久坐时间(ST),和/或具体的放学后SB(例如,电视观看)客观或主观;并提供了在ST/SB或行为持续时间和期间度过的课后时间的百分比来计算这一点。在可能的情况下,按地点分析结果(例如,课后照顾/“其他”地点)。遵循PRISMA指南。纳入了29项研究:24项包括儿童(≤12岁),4项评估青少年(>12岁),1项包括两者; 20项评估ST,9项评估SB。平均而言,儿童在课后护理和其他地点分别花费41%和51%的课后时间在ST中。青少年花了57%的课后时间在ST. SB儿童和青少年执行包括:看电视(周期的20%),非基于屏幕的SB(包括家庭作业; 20%),基于屏幕的SB(包括看电视; 18%),家庭作业/学术(13%),机动交通(12%),社交SB(9%)和基于屏幕的SB(不包括看电视; 6%)。儿童放学后有一半时间在ST,青少年的比例更高。放学后进行各种基于筛查和非筛查的SB,为干预提供关键目标。PROSPERO注册号CRD 42015010437本文的在线版本(doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0419-1)包含补充材料,可供授权用户使用。
Independent of physical activity levels, youth sedentary behaviors (SB) have negative health outcomes. SB prevalence estimates during discretionary periods of the day (e.g., after-school), inform the need for targeted period-specific interventions. This systematic review aimed to determine children’s and adolescents’ SB prevalence during the after-school period. A computerized search was conducted in October 2015 (analysed November 2015). Inclusion criteria were: published in a peer-reviewed English journal; participants aged 5-18 years; measured overall after-school sedentary time (ST) objectively, and/or specific after-school SBs (e.g., TV viewing) objectively or subjectively; and provided the percentage of the after-school period spent in ST/SB or duration of behavior and period to calculate this. Where possible, findings were analyzed by location (e.g., after-school care/‘other’ locations). The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Twenty-nine studies were included: 24 included children (≤12 years), four assessed adolescents (>12 years) and one included both; 20 assessed ST and nine assessed SB. On average, children spent 41 % and 51 % of the after-school period in ST when at after-school care and other locations respectively. Adolescents spent 57 % of the after-school period in ST. SBs that children and adolescents perform include: TV viewing (20 % of the period), non-screen based SB (including homework; 20 %), screen-based SB (including TV viewing; 18 %), homework/academics (13 %), motorised transport (12 %), social SB (9 %), and screen-based SB (excluding TV viewing; 6 %). Children spent up to half of the after-school period in ST and this is higher among adolescents. A variety of screen- and non-screen based SBs are performed after school, providing key targets for interventions. PROSPERO registration number CRD42015010437 The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0419-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.