Rules for Choosing Societal Tradeoffs
Rules for Choosing Societal Tradeoffs
复制标题
选择社会权衡的规则
DOI：
10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10055
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Yuqian Li
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Vincent Conitzer;Rupert Freeman;Markus Brill;Yuqian Li
我们研究社会权衡问题，其中一组选民各自提交他们在每对活动之间的理想权衡值（例如，“使用一加仑汽油与产生2袋垃圾填埋场垃圾一样糟糕”），然后使用规则将这些聚合到社会权衡向量中。我们介绍了家庭的距离为基础的规则，并表明，这些可以被证明是最大似然估计的真相。在这个家庭中，我们挑出对数距离为基础的规则，特别吸引人的社会选择理论公理化的基础上。我们给出了一个有效的算法执行这一规则以及近似爬山算法，并评估这些实验。
We study the societal tradeoffs problem, where a set of voters each submit their ideal tradeoff value between each pair of activities (e.g., "using a gallon of gasoline is as bad as creating 2 bags of landfill trash"), and these are then aggregated into the societal tradeoff vector using a rule. We introduce the family of distance-based rules and show that these can be justified as maximum likelihood estimators of the truth. Within this family, we single out the logarithmic distance-based rule as especially appealing based on a social-choice-theoretic axiomatization. We give an efficient algorithm for executing this rule as well as an approximate hill climbing algorithm, and evaluate these experimentally.