Detection of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli from children with and without diarrhea in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil

Detection of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli from children with and without diarrhea in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
复制标题

DOI:
10.1590/s0074-02762007005000116
复制
发表时间:
2007-11-01
期刊:
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Trabulsi, Luiz Rachid
Trabulsi, Luiz Rachid
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bueris, Vanessa;Sircili, Marcelo Palma;Trabulsi, Luiz Rachid

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

作为病例对照研究的一部分,我们从巴西萨尔瓦多巴伊亚州1,207名患有和不患有急性地方性腹泻的儿童中分离出不同的致泻性(DEC)大肠杆菌病毒型。由于DEC的鉴定不能仅基于生化和培养标准,我们采用了一种多重聚合酶链式反应,该方法是由肠致病性大肠埃希氏菌(EPEC)、志贺毒素产生的大肠杆菌/肠出血性大肠杆菌(STEC/EHEC)、产肠毒素大肠杆菌(ETEQ)和肠聚集性大肠杆菌(EAEC)的5对特异引物组合而成,在一步反应中同时检测这些病原菌。为了区分典型和非典型EPEC菌株,对这些菌株进行了EAF质粒的检测。在全球病例对照研究的这一样本中,腹泻组(1020例)和对照组(187例)中致泻性大肠埃希菌的患病率分别为25.4%(259例)和18.7%(35例)。最常见的病原型是EAEC(10.7%),其次是非典型EPEC(9.4%)、ETEC(3.7%)和STEC(0.6%)。仅在一个样本中检测到典型的EPEC。所研究的腹泻儿童和非腹泻儿童的致病类型的患病率没有显著差异。
We identified different diarrheagenic (DEC) Escherichia coli pathotypes isolated from 1,207 children with and without acute endemic diarrhea in Salvador Bahia, Brazil collected as part of a case-control study. Since the identification of DEC cannot be based on only biochemical and culture criteria, we used a multiplex polymerase chain reaction developed by combining five specific primer pairs for Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), Shiga toxin-producing E. coli/Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (STEC/EHEC), Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEQ and Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) to detect these pathotypes simultaneously in a single-step reaction. In order to distinguish typical and atypical EPEC strains, these were tested for the presence of EAF plasmid. The prevalence of diarrheagenic E. coli in this sample of a global case-control study was 25.4% (259 patients) and 18.7% (35 patients) in the diarrhea group (1, 020 patients) and the control group (18 7 patients), respectively. The most frequently isolated pathotype was EAEC (10.7%), followed by atypical EPEC (9.4%), ETEC (3.7%), and STEC (0.6%). Typical EPEC was detected only in one sample. The prevalence of the pathotypes studied in children with diarrhea was not significantly different from that in children without diarrhea.