The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction at Five: Lessons from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami
The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction at Five: Lessons from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s13753-020-00268-9
复制
发表时间：
2020-04-20
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Suppasri, Anawat
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Maly, Elizabeth;Suppasri, Anawat
《2015-2030年仙台减少灾害风险框架》（SFDRR）是一种与发展和恢复相联系的包容性减少灾害风险方法。在以往国际准则的基础上，《减少灾害风险战略框架》促进减少灾害损失的实际和可衡量的成果，包括衡量实现七个具体全球目标进展情况的指标。本文以2011年东日本大地震和海啸为例，结合SFDRR的优先事项和全球目标进行评价，说明灾前海啸灾害工程和灾后恢复的进展和局限性。关于仙台框架中规定的与减少风险和海啸工程有关的目标，特别是优先事项1，了解灾害风险，在灾害评估和海啸探测和预警系统方面取得了重大进展。虽然《减灾战略框架》通过优先事项4强调恢复阶段的行动，加强备灾，强调重建得更好的概念，但这本身并不能作为指导恢复的明确指示。然而，《减少灾害战略框架》以人为本和包容性的总体方法以及全球目标和若干次级优先事项，可以成为塑造恢复良好做法和评估恢复进展的有用方法。
The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 (SFDRR) represents an inclusive approach to disaster risk reduction, linked to development and recovery. Building on previous international guidelines, the SFDRR promotes practical and measurable outcomes for reducing disaster losses, including indicators to measure progress towards seven specific global targets. Evaluated in the context of the priorities and global targets of the SFDRR, the article considers the case of the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami of 2011 to illustrate advances and limitations in pre-disaster tsunami hazard engineering and post-disaster recovery. With respect to the targets set out in the Sendai Framework related to risk reduction and tsunami engineering, especially Priority 1, understanding disaster risk, there have been significant advances in hazard assessment and systems for tsunami detection and warning. Although the SFDRR emphasizes actions in the recovery phase through Priority 4, enhancing disaster preparedness with an emphasis on the concept of build back better, on its own this does not function as a clear directive for guiding recovery. However, the overall people-centered and inclusive approach of the SFDRR, as well as the global targets and several sub-priorities, can be a useful way to shape good practices in recovery and evaluate recovery progress.