Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946)
Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946)
复制标题
成文法的无法无天与超成文法 (1946)
DOI：
10.1093/ojls/gqi041
复制
发表时间：
2006
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
G. Radbruch
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Radbruch
国家社会主义通过“命令就是命令”和“法律就是法律”这两条格言，设法把它的追随者分别束缚在士兵和法学家身上。前一条原则在适用性上总是受到限制;士兵没有义务服从为犯罪目的而发出的命令。“法律就是法律”，另一方面，不知道任何限制。它表达了实证主义的法律的思想，这种思想几乎没有受到挑战，在德国法学家中占据了统治地位几十年。因此，“成文法的无法性”是一个自相矛盾的术语，正如“超成文法”一样。2今天，这两个问题都一再地在法律的实践中遇到。例如，最近，《西德法学报》发表并评论了威斯巴登市法院[1945年11月作出]的一项裁决，根据这项裁决，
By means of two maxims, 'An order is an order' and 'a law is a law', National Socialism contrived to bind its followers to itself, soldiers and jurists respectively. The former tenet was always restricted in its applicability; soldiers had no obligation to obey orders serving criminal purposes.' 'A law is a law', on the other hand, knew no restriction whatever. It expressed the positivistic legal thinking that, almost unchallenged, held sway over German jurists for many decades. 'Statutory lawlessness' was, accordingly, a contradiction in terms, just as 'supra-statutory law' was.2 Today, both problems confront legal practice time and time again. Recently, for example, the Siiddeutsche Juristen-Zeitung published and commented on a decision of the Wiesbaden Municipal Court [handed down in November of 1945], according to which the 'statutes that declared the property