Enabling Clinical Trials for AMR in the Era of Precision Medicine.
Enabling Clinical Trials for AMR in the Era of Precision Medicine.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/tp.0000000000003275
复制
发表时间:
2021-03-01
期刊:
影响因子:
6.2
通讯作者:
Menon MC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cumpelik A;Zhang Z;Menon MC
Late antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains an important determinant of long-term allograft loss. Although significant progress has been made in continuously refining AMR diagnostic criteria1 and understanding underlying molecular mechanisms, strategies to prognosticate or risk stratify late AMR, and thereafter alter management, are not being clinically utilized. Although several treatment protocols have been used for late AMR, these approaches have not consistently translated into meaningful long-term outcomes. New clinically applicable approaches are thus required to examine the natural course of AMR, define early surrogate outcomes (to assess response rates), and identify subgroups for potential targeted therapies. Novel studies examining these metrics in late AMR could provide a valuable foundation for subsequent robust interventional trials. In the current issue of Transplantation, Irish et al2 retrospectively examine the utility of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope within the first 12 months after an episode of late AMR as an early surrogate end point to relay the risk for death-censored graft failure (DCGF) using a historical cohort of 91 patients. Patients with anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) positive, biopsy-proven AMR (> 1 y posttransplant and with 3 y of follow-up) across 4 North American and European centers were included. This predominantly Caucasian cohort was treated per usual standard of care at each center, while 37% did not receive specific treatment. DCGF, defined as renal replacement therapy or persistent eGFR< 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, was observed in 59% of patients during follow-up. Using smoothed regression, the authors confirmed the intuitive observation that baseline eGFR, as well as a representative eGFR slope, especially in the first year post-AMR, was significantly associated with DCGF events. Although some of the tested variables were associated with baseline eGFR, no variable significantly interacted with eGFR slope. Applying a novel joint modeling approach, the authors then elegantly estimated that a 30% improvement of eGFR slope in the first year post-AMR translates to a 10% improvement in DCGF for 5 years. The authors conclude that 1-year eGFR slope post-AMR diagnosis could help design future clinical trials for late AMR.The modeling of DCGF using a time-dependent covariate such as eGFR needs careful considerations. A typical treatment of a time-dependent covariate in a Cox model assumes (1) the covariate has no measurement errors and (2) the possible missing values in the longitudinal observations are not related to graft failure (ie, values missing at random). These assumptions do not hold true for creatinine-based eGFR data. First, measurement errors in creatinine and therefore eGFR often exist. Next, any missing values in follow-up eGFR observations could themselves be due to graft loss (ie, values missing not at random) potentially leading to biased results. Advantage of the joint model applied in this study are the following:(1) the use of a linear mixed model to more accurately estimate the “true” trajectory of eGFR overtime by taking into account measurement errors at each time point, as well as subjectspecific random effects;(2) the use of this estimated “true” trajectory in the Cox model for DCGF; and (3) linking of these 2 submodels in the final model with subject-specific random effects. Therefore, in this dataset, the joint model allows the risk for DCGF to be dynamically predicted in each patient by utilizing the longitudinal eGFR measurements (represented here by eGFR slope). These predictions can be made specific to each subject, a particularly useful feature for a …