A framework for quantifying node-level community structure group differences in brain connectivity networks.

A framework for quantifying node-level community structure group differences in brain connectivity networks.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/978-3-642-33418-4_25
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
LECTURE NOTES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Leow, Alex D.
Leow, Alex D.
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
GadElkarim, Johnson J.;Schonfeld, Dan;Ajilore, Olusola;Zhan, Liang;Zhang, Aifeng F.;Feusner, Jamie D.;Thompson, Paul M.;Simon, Tony J.;Kumar, Anand;Leow, Alex D.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

我们提出了一个框架,用于量化群体之间的节点级社区结构,使用来自dti -神经束成像的解剖脑网络。为了构建社区,我们通过最大化两个度量来计算分层二叉树:众所周知的模块化度量(Q)和一个衡量社区间和社区内路径长度差异的新度量。在节点水平上评估了生成树之间群落结构的变化,并开发了一个统计框架来检测两组群落结构之间的局部差异。我们将这一框架应用于42名重度抑郁症患者和47名健康对照者的样本。结果表明,默认模式网络中的几个节点(包括与自我意识相关的双侧楔前叶)在组间表现出显著差异。这些发现与之前的文献报道一致,表明抑郁症患者有更高程度的反刍性自我反省。
We propose a framework for quantifying node-level community structures between groups using anatomical brain networks derived from DTI-tractography. To construct communities, we computed hierarchical binary trees by maximizing two metrics: the well-known modularity metric (Q), and a novel metric that measures the difference between inter-community and intra-community path lengths. Changes in community structures on the nodal level were assessed between generated trees and a statistical framework was developed to detect local differences between two groups of community structures. We applied this framework to a sample of 42 subjects with major depression and 47 healthy controls. Results showed that several nodes (including the bilateral precuneus, which have been linked to self-awareness) within the default mode network exhibited significant differences between groups. These findings are consistent with those reported in previous literature, suggesting a higher degree of ruminative self-reflections in depression.
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1929-08.2008
发表时间: 2008-09-10
期刊: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
影响因子: --
作者:
Bassett DS;Bullmore E;Verchinski BA;Mattay VS;Weinberger DR;Meyer-Lindenberg A
通讯作者: Meyer-Lindenberg A
DOI: 10.3389/neuro.11.037.2009
发表时间: 2009
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Meunier D;Lambiotte R;Fornito A;Ersche KD;Bullmore ET
通讯作者: Bullmore ET
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.035
发表时间: 2012-02-15
期刊: NEUROIMAGE
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Alexander-Bloch, Aaron;Lambiotte, Renaud;Roberts, Ben;Giedd, Jay;Gogtay, Nitin;Bullmore, Edward T.
通讯作者: Bullmore, Edward T.
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2874-10.2010
发表时间: 2010-11-24
影响因子: 5.3
作者:
van den Heuvel, Martijn P.;Mandl, Rene C. W.;Pol, Hilleke E. Hulshoff
通讯作者: Pol, Hilleke E. Hulshoff
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.84.016111
发表时间: 2011-07
期刊: Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics
影响因子: --
作者:
Steen M;Hayasaka S;Joyce K;Laurienti P
通讯作者: Laurienti P