Oral Tradition as History

Oral Tradition as History
复制标题

作为历史的口头传统

DOI:
10.2307/484404
复制
发表时间:
1986
影响因子:
1.1
通讯作者:
J. Vansina
J. Vansina
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Josephine C. Miller;J. Vansina

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

扬·范西纳1961年的著作《口述传统》被国际上誉为民族史领域的先驱之作。它最初以法文出版,后来被翻译成英文、西班牙文、意大利文、阿拉伯文和匈牙利文。评论家们一致称赞范西纳成功地将口头传统进行了严格的功能分析。现在,Vansina受益于二十年的额外思考和研究,大幅修改了他的原始作品,完全重写了一些部分并添加了许多新材料。其结果是一个基本上是新的工作,不可或缺的所有学生和学者的历史学,人类学,民俗学和民族史谁是关心的传输和潜在的使用口头材料。那些开始具有挑战性的冒险历史实地考察与口头社区将发现这本书是一个宝贵的伴侣,充满了良好的实用建议。那些已经收集了大量口头材料的人,或者那些努力解释和分析别人收集的材料的人,将被迫根据范西纳深思熟虑和挑衅性的见解,对自己的方法论进行批判性的重新审视。. . .在世纪的四分之一时间里,我们第二次深深地感激扬·范西纳。“非洲文学研究”口述历史是对非洲历史基础文献的重要补充。《美国历史评论》
Jan Vansina s 1961 book, "Oral Tradition," was hailed internationally as a pioneering work in the field of ethno-history. Originally published in French, it was translated into English, Spanish, Italian, Arabic, and Hungarian. Reviewers were unanimous in their praise of Vansina s success in subjecting oral traditions to intense functional analysis. Now, Vansina with the benefit of two decades of additional thought and research has revised his original work substantially, completely rewriting some sections and adding much new material. The result is an essentially new work, indispensable to all students and scholars of history, anthropology, folklore, and ethno-history who are concerned with the transmission and potential uses of oral material. Those embarking on the challenging adventure of historical fieldwork with an oral community will find the book a valuable companion, filled with good practical advice. Those who already have collected bodies of oral material, or who strive to interpret and analyze that collected by others, will be forced to subject their own methodological approaches to a critical reexamination in the light of Vansina s thoughtful and provocative insights. . . . For the second time in a quarter of a century, we are profoundly in the debt of Jan Vansina. "Research in African Literatures" Oral Traditions as History is an essential addition to the basic literature of African history. "American Historical Review""