How time and platform impact coverage of the Black Lives Matter movement

How time and platform impact coverage of the Black Lives Matter movement
复制标题

时间和平台如何影响“黑人生命也是命”运动的报道

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
--
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Xi Zou
Xi Zou
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wenjun Xie;Rong Qi Liew;Yuan Wu;Xi Zou

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

现代“黑人的命也是命”运动的兴起可以追溯到两个关键事件:2012年特雷沃恩·马丁(Trayvon Martin)之死和2014年迈克尔·布朗(Michael Brown)之死。研究通常表明,主流媒体的叙事选择将抗议者及其原因边缘化并使其失去合法性,这种模式被称为抗议范式。本研究纵向考察了同一主流媒体系统对类似事件的报道是如何变化的,以及记者挑战其他学术工作中概念化的预测范式的程度。对全国报纸报道的内容分析显示,在司法判决之前,新闻集中在抗议者的策略(暴力与和平)上,而在袭击者被判无罪后,新闻则转向了思想(不满和要求)领域。在这两起案件之间,对抗议报道的合法化没有取得进展。威尔逊。最终,本研究中的分析显示了传统新闻媒体如何谈论美国正在进行的黑人抗议活动,为当代研究提供了另一个组成部分,以研究最近的抗议和骚乱(Elmasry和el-Nawawy 2016; mour<e:1>, Brown, and Sylvie 2018; Steiner和Waisbord 2017)。我们的研究结果深入了解了报道与进步的、基于种族的抗议运动的现实之间的关系,以及它与导致黑人持续压迫的法律体系之间的联系(例如Alexander 2010)。
The rise of the modern Black Lives Matter movement can be traced back to two key events, the 2012 death of Trayvon Martin and the 2014 death of Michael Brown. Research routinely showed that mainstream media ’ s narrative choices marginalize and delegitimize protesters and their causes, a pattern known as the protest paradigm. This study provides a longitudinal examination of how the same mainstream media system varied in their coverage of similar events and the degree to which journalists challenged the predicted paradigms conceptualized in other aca-demic work. A content analysis of national newspaper coverage revealed that news before the judicial rulings focused on protesters ’ tactics (violence versus peaceful) and changed to the realm of ideas (grievances and demands) after the assailants were considered not guilty of wrongdoing. No progression was found in legitimizing coverage of protests between the two cases. Wilson. Ultimately, the analysis in this study shows how traditional news media talk about ongoing Black protests in the United States, providing another constituent of contemporary research that examines recent protests and unrest (Elmasry and el-Nawawy 2016; Mourão, Brown, and Sylvie 2018; Steiner and Waisbord 2017). Our results offer insight into the relationship between coverage and the reality of progressive, race-based protest movements, and its connection with the legal system that contributes to continued Black oppres-sion (e.g. Alexander 2010).