Economic analysis of conventional-dose chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer.
Economic analysis of conventional-dose chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer.
复制标题
常规剂量化疗与高剂量化疗联合自体造血干细胞移植治疗转移性乳腺癌的经济分析。
DOI:
10.1038/sj.bmt.1703795
复制
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Glick,JH
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Schulman,KA;Stadtmauer,EA;Reed,SD;Glick,HA;Goldstein,LJ;Pines,JM;Jackman,JA;Suzuki,S;Styler,MJ;Crilley,PA;Klumpp,TR;Mangan,KF;Glick,JH
We performed an economic analysis of data from 180 women in a clinical trial of conventional-dose chemotherapy vs high-dose chemotherapy plus stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer responding to first-line chemotherapy. Data on resource use, including hospitalizations, medical procedures, medications, and diagnostic tests, were abstracted from subjects' clinical trial records. Resources were valued using the Medicare Fee Schedule for inpatient costs at one academic medical center and average wholesale prices for medications. Monthly costs were calculated and stratified by treatment group and clinical phase. Mean follow-up was 690 days in the transplantation group and 758 days in the conventional-dose chemotherapy group. Subjects in the transplantation group were hospitalized for more days (28.6 vs 17.8, P= 0.0041) and incurred higher costs ($84 055 vs $28 169) than subjects receiving conventional-dose chemotherapy, with a mean difference of $55 886 (95% CI, $47 298–$63 666). Sensitivity analyses resulted in cost differences between the treatment groups from $36 528 to $75 531. High-dose chemotherapy plus stem-cell transplantation resulted in substantial additional morbidity and costs at no improvement in survival. Neither the survival results nor the economic findings support the use of this procedure outside of the clinical trial setting.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Cassileth, PA;Harrington, DP;Wiernik, PH
通讯作者:
Wiernik, PH
影响因子:
45.3
作者:
R. García;M. Hidalgo;L. Paz;J. Calzas;H. Gómez;J. Guerra;R. Hitt;J. Hornedo;R. Colomer;H. Cortés
通讯作者:
H. Cortés
影响因子:
45.3
作者:
M. Crump;P. Goss;M. Prince;C. Girouard
通讯作者:
C. Girouard
影响因子:
45.3
作者:
S. Williams;R. Mick;R. Desser;J. Golick;J. Beschorner;J. Bitran
通讯作者:
J. Bitran
影响因子:
45.3
作者:
Z. Rahman;D. Frye;A. U. Buzdar;T. L. Smith;Lina Asmar;R. Champlin;G. Hortobagyi
通讯作者:
G. Hortobagyi