Public child law - a service priority?
Public child law - a service priority?
复制标题
公共儿童法——服务优先事项？
DOI：
10.1080/09649069.2011.632886
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
Masson J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Masson J
本文探讨了公共儿童法的法律的援助制度的变化的影响，从一个主要的定性研究：父母在护理程序的代表（ESRC RES-062-23-1163）的数据。具体而言，它研究了在固定费用制度下，律师为保持盈利能力而采取的策略，2010年合同过程的影响和倡导者对家庭倡导计划的看法，以及从私人家庭法中撤回大多数法律的援助的实践环境变化可能产生的影响。尽管口头上说要保护服务质量，但质量评估机制很少考虑到客户的需要。尽管公共儿童法保留了法律的援助，但律师供应和服务质量的下降威胁到父母诉诸司法的机会。
This paper explores the impact of changes to the Legal Aid regime on public child law, drawing on data from a major qualitative study:Parents' Representation in Care Proceedings (ESRC RES-062-23-1163). Specifically, it examines the strategies solicitors adopted to maintain profitability under the fixed fee regime, the impact of the 2010 contract process and advocates' views of the Family Advocacy Scheme, as well as the likely effect of the changing context for practice from the withdrawal of most Legal Aid from private family law. Despite a rhetoric of protecting service quality, little account has been taken of clients' needs in the mechanisms for quality assessment. Reductions in the supply of lawyers and in service quality threaten access to justice for parents despite the retention of Legal Aid for public child law.