International Society as a Process: Institutions, Identities, and China’s Peaceful Rise
International Society as a Process: Institutions, Identities, and China’s Peaceful Rise
复制标题
国际社会作为一个过程：制度、身份与中国的和平崛起
DOI：
10.1093/cjip/poq007
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Yaqing Qin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yaqing Qin
随着中国继续快速发展，问题仍然是，“中国有可能和平崛起吗？”人们普遍认为，中国从1979年到现在的崛起是相当成功的，但人们仍然对其和平崛起感到担忧，或者至少是普遍的不确定性。现实主义者认为，一个崛起的大国迟早会挑战霸权和现有的国际秩序，可能是通过暴力的、系统性的战争。自由主义者担心中国的政治制度和意识形态。尽管他们相信充满自由思想和规范的国际制度将极大地纳入中国并约束其行为，但由于国际体系的无政府性质、国际制度的局限性以及中国国内的政治和社会经济进程，不确定性仍然存在。以国际社会为核心概念的英国学派从不同的角度也有类似的关注。它更多的是关于身份，即。
As China continues rapidly to develop, the question remains, ‘Is it possible for China to rise peacefully?’ It is generally agreed that China’s rise from 1979 to the present has been quite successful, but there is still worry, or at least widespread uncertainty, about its peaceful rise. Realists argue that a rising power will sooner or later challenge the hegemon and the existing international order, probably through violent, systemic war. Liberals worry about China’s political system and ideology. Although they believe that international institutions permeated with liberal ideas and norms will greatly incorporate China and constrain its behavior, uncertainty nonetheless exists owing to the anarchical nature of the international system, the limitations of international institutions, and China’s domestic political and socio-economic processes. The English School, with its key concept of international society, has similar concerns from a different angle. They are more about identity, i.e.