Cities within cities: intra-urban comparison of infrastructure in Mumbai, Delhi and Cape Town
Cities within cities: intra-urban comparison of infrastructure in Mumbai, Delhi and Cape Town
复制标题
城中城：孟买、德里和开普敦基础设施的城市内比较
DOI：
10.1080/02723638.2016.1243386
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Yaffa Truelove
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Colin Mcfarlane;Jon Silver;Yaffa Truelove
比较现在被认为是构成关于城市和城市化的知识的关键。然而，关于比较城市主义的争论更多地关注城市间比较的优点，而不是城市内比较的潜力和挑战，即我们所说的“城市内比较”（IUC）。我们认为，关注城市内部不同形式的城市主义可能会为城市内部和城市间的比较项目提供关键知识。IUCs强调了“城市”类别中固有的多样性，揭示了城市的各个维度，这些维度是城市如何运作和体验的核心。我们在三个城市：孟买、德里和开普敦进行实地调查，并考虑这些城市在历史上是如何被理解为一个城市内不同的城市世界的，并讨论我们在基础设施上进行的IUCs的主要发现。我们发现IUCs可以加强城市内部和城市之间的比较工作：重新定义城市政治；关注城市生活的变化和矛盾的轨迹；并使渐进式变革得以发生的各种途径变得清晰可见。
ABSTRACT Comparison is now taken as vital to the constitution of knowledge about cities and urbanism. However, debate on comparative urbanism has been far more attentive to the merits of comparisons between cities than it has been to the potential and challenges of comparisons within cities—to what we call “Intra-Urban Comparison” (IUC). We argue that a focus on the diverse forms of urbanism located within cities may generate critical knowledge for both intra- and inter-urban comparative projects. IUCs highlight the diversity inherent in the category “city,” revealing dimensions of the urban that are central to how cities work and are experienced. We mobilise fieldwork within three cities: Mumbai, Delhi and Cape Town, and consider both how these cities have been historically understood as different urban worlds within a city, and discuss key findings from IUCs we have conducted on infrastructures. We find that IUCs can enhance comparative work both within and between cities: reconceptualising urban politics; attending to the varied and contradictory trajectories of urban life; and bringing visibility to the diverse routes through which progressive change can occur.
从伦敦到孟买再回来：比较视角下的绅士化和公共政策
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Harris A
通讯作者：
Harris A
孟买的水战
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Graham S
通讯作者：
Graham S