Speed and Accuracy in the Processing of False Statements About Semantic Information
Speed and Accuracy in the Processing of False Statements About Semantic Information
复制标题
处理语义信息错误陈述的速度和准确性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1982
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
G. McKoon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Ratcliff;G. McKoon
给出了八个语义验证实验的数据。使用了两种程序，标准反应时间程序和反应信号程序。反应信号过程的数据表明，对于错误的类别成员陈述（例如，所有的鸟都是知更鸟），在加工的早期，回答“是”的倾向增加，在加工的后期，回答“否”的倾向增加。对于涉及反义词关系的陈述（所有母亲都是父亲），来自响应信号过程的数据表明，与异常陈述（椅子是墙）相比，回答“是”的倾向并不大。标准反应时间程序的结果不能用反应信号程序的结果来预测。这表明，语义验证任务的简单模型假设一个是/否维度，在这个维度上进行区分是不正确的。对于适当的模型所需的各种属性，提出了一些建议。语义记忆领域的研究主要集中在语义信息的结构和主语验证表达语义信息的句子的过程。已经开发了验证过程的模型，并将模型的结构转换为应该影响的实验变量
Data from eight experiments on semantic verification are presented. Two procedures were used, a standard reaction time procedure and a response signal procedure. Data from the response signal procedure showed that for false category-member statements (e.g., all birds are robins), there was an increasing tendency to respond yes early in processing, replaced later in processing by an increasing tendency to respond no. For statements involving antonym relationships (all mothers are fathers), data from the response signal procedure showed that there is no greater tendency to respond yes than for anomalous statements (a chair is a wall). Results in the standard reaction time procedure could not be predicted from the results in the response signal procedure. This suggests that simple models of the semantic verification task that assume a single yes/no dimension on which discrimination is made are not correct. Some suggestions are made as to the kinds of properties that would be required for an adequate model. Research in the area of semantic memory has focused on the structure of semantic information and the processes by which subjects verify sentences expressing semantic information. Models of the processes of verification have been developed and the constructs of the models translated into experimental variables that are supposed to affect