Does scientific conjecture accurately describe restoration practice? Insight from an international river restoration survey
Does scientific conjecture accurately describe restoration practice? Insight from an international river restoration survey
复制标题
科学猜想是否准确地描述了修复实践？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jim A Milne
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Wheaton;S. Darby;D. Sear;Jim A Milne
很少有资料可以概括出令人难以置信的多样化的国际河流恢复界。修复文献中的概括往往基于个人经验或逻辑猜想。为了填补这一空白，发起了一项基于网络的国际调查。来自37个不同国家的500多名受访者参与了调查。这些结果被发布在网上，作为一个感知和个人经验的数据库，修复界可以从中做出自己的解释。通过三个例子，我们将科学猜想与参与本调查的修复社区的看法进行对比。
Few sources exist to draw generalizations about the incredibly diverse international river restoration community. Generalizations in the restoration literature tend to be grounded on individual experiences or logical conjecture. To fill this perceived gap, an international web-based survey was launched. Over 500 respondents from 37 different countries participated. The results, posted on the web, act as a database of perceptions and individual experiences, from which the restoration community can make their own interpretations. With three examples, we contrast scientific conjecture with the perceptions of the restoration community who participated in this survey.