Medicine-by-wire: Practical considerations on formal techniques for dependable medical systems
Medicine-by-wire: Practical considerations on formal techniques for dependable medical systems
复制标题
线控医疗:可靠医疗系统正式技术的实际考虑
DOI:
10.1016/j.scico.2020.102545
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
1.3
通讯作者:
Freitas L
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Freitas L
We see the future of medicine as highly automated. Improvement in care-provision will be achieved by both increased clinician efficiency, as well as new computing assisted treatments and diagnoses. In other safety-critical industries, such as avionics and automotive, certification is dependability-driven. In contrast, medical certification is clinical-trial driven, which we argue will become increasingly problematic with increasing medical device and software complexity. By dependability, we mean the dictionary notion: reliable and trustworthy. Thus, failures are either avoided by design, or are accountable to a measured extent. This touches upon the verification (intent) versus validation (outcome) problem. Even though correctness does not imply safety, we do believe from our experiences that, the process of striving for correctness (verification) done right does shed light on safety; on whether the requirements/assumptions were addressed as intended (validation).Medical device trials can lead to adequate assurances of safety, as defined by the local regulatory burden. Nevertheless, the nature of such complex systems means that certain errors may not be detected by trials and so additional efforts to reduce errors is needed. Our intent is, at least for software, to explore the contrast between approaches: correctness-by-construction versus correct-by-trial. Additionally, these levels of safety and effectiveness of systems vary across regulatory domains in different countries. A key challenge is how to achieve a successful interaction between verification tasks using formal methods and system development tasks within engineering teams without prior knowledge of formal techniques.This paper describes a pragmatic process for the application of formal techniques, which is illustrated for three medical devices during pre-clinical development prior to certification. That means, the techniques are not only applied to realistic systems, but are also taken up by development teams themselves (i.e.cannot be entirely formal expert driven). We demonstrate differences in applying formalisms at the start, midpoint and final development stages. In particular, we describe the underlying socio-technical challenges and how we developed mitigation methods for each exemplar case. This paper is not about a general technique for medical automation, as we do not believe this is practical/possible given the varied/dynamic nature of medical problems.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1972
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
P. Naur
通讯作者:
P. Naur
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West)
影响因子:
--
作者:
M. Coulthard;J. Crosier;C. Griffiths;Jon H. Smith;M. Drinnan;Michael Whitaker;R. Beckwith;J. Matthews;P. Flecknell;H. Lambert
通讯作者:
H. Lambert
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Judith Carlton;David Crocker
通讯作者:
David Crocker
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2005
期刊:
International Workshop Automated Verification Critical Systems
影响因子:
--
作者:
Philippa J. Hopcroft;G. Broadfoot
通讯作者:
G. Broadfoot
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Sven Nordhoff
通讯作者:
Sven Nordhoff