Using Profile of Mood States (POMS) to monitor high-intensity training in cyclists: Group versus case studies
Using Profile of Mood States (POMS) to monitor high-intensity training in cyclists: Group versus case studies
复制标题
DOI：
10.1123/tsp.14.2.138
复制
发表时间：
2000-06-01
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Gates, W
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Martin, DT;Andersen, MB;Gates, W
本研究旨在探讨情绪状态问卷（POMS）是否是监测自行车运动员训练应激的有用工具。参与者（n = 11）在六周的高强度间歇自行车和一周的减量期间每周完成POMS。在训练的前三周，骑自行车的表现有所改善，在第4周和第5周达到稳定，在第6周后略有下降，然后在一周的逐渐减少中显著增加。无论是高强度间歇训练还是一周的减量训练都没有显著影响总的情绪或特定的情绪状态。两名自行车运动员在逐渐减量（过度训练）期间没有表现出改善的表现能力，与自行车运动员相比，他们的POMS数据并没有明显的独特性。此外，一个骑自行车的人，谁在某些日子有最高的总情绪困扰，反应良好的锥度，并产生了他最好的个人努力，在这段时间内。这些发现提出了关于POMS的有用性的问题，以区分，在个人层面上，生产和反生产的高强度训练期间。
This study examined whether the Profile of Mood States questionnaire (POMS) is a useful tool for monitoring training stress in cycling athletes. Participants (n = 11) completed the POMS weekly during six weeks of high-intensity interval cycling and a one-week taper. Cycling performance improved over the first three weeks of training, plateaued during Weeks 4 and 5, decreased slightly following Week 6, and then significantly increased during the one-week taper. Neither the high-intensity interval training nor the one-week taper significantly affected total mood or specific mood states. POMS data from two cyclists who did not show improved performance capabilities during the taper (overtraining) were not distinctly unique when compared to cyclists who did improve. Also, one cyclist, who on some days had the highest total mood disturbance, responded well to the taper and produced his best personal effort during this time period. These findings raise questions about the usefulness of POMS to distinguish, at an individual level, between periods of productive and counterproductive high-intensity training.