Building partnerships in community-based participatory research: budgetary and other cost considerations.
Building partnerships in community-based participatory research: budgetary and other cost considerations.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1524839913485962
复制
发表时间：
2014-03
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Boyer BB
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hoeft TJ;Burke W;Hopkins SE;Charles W;Trinidad SB;James RD;Boyer BB
基于社区的参与性研究（CBPR）是与社区合作减少健康差距的重要框架。与社区合作会产生额外的成本，其中一些可以在预算摘要页面中表示出来，而另一些则与社区和学术合作伙伴的竞争需求有关。这些成本考虑可以为社区-学术伙伴关系的发展提供信息。我们根据一个正在进行的CBPR项目的案例研究计算了成本，该项目涉及阿拉斯加农村社区共同研究人员的社区规划小组（CPG）和一个帮助弥合CPG与学术共同研究人员之间沟通的双文化联络小组。具体到CBPR的预算考虑包括差旅费和其他与通信有关的费用、对社区合作伙伴的补偿以及会议上提供的食物。我们还确定了社区和学术合作伙伴竞争需求的来源。我们的研究结果可以为社区-学术伙伴关系中的预算讨论提供信息。讨论对社区合作伙伴时间的竞争需求可以帮助规划CBPR项目的时间表。我们的研究结果也可能为学术研究人员参与CBPR的终身教职和晋升政策的讨论提供信息。
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an important framework for partnering with communities to reduce health disparities. Working in partnership with community incurs additional costs, some that can be represented in a budget summary page and others that are tied to the competing demands placed on community and academic partners. These cost considerations can inform development of community-academic partnerships. We calculated costs from a case study based on an ongoing CBPR project involving a Community Planning Group (CPG) of community co-researchers in rural Alaska and a bicultural liaison group who help bridge communication between CPG and academic co-researchers. Budget considerations specific to CBPR include travel and other communication-related costs, compensation for community partners, and food served at meetings. We also identified sources of competing demands for community and academic partners. Our findings can inform budget discussions in community-academic partnerships. Discussions of competing demands on community partners’ time can help plan timelines for CBPR projects. Our findings may also inform discussions about tenure and promotion policies that may represent barriers to participation in CBPR for academic researchers.