Regional Issue: Social Policy Developments in Australia and New Zealand.
Regional Issue: Social Policy Developments in Australia and New Zealand.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/spol.12037
复制
发表时间：
2013-12
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Deeming C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Deeming C
弗朗西斯·卡斯尔斯（Francis Castles）在其著名的比较政策著作中指出，澳大利亚和新西兰在世纪已经形成了一种激进的工资收入福利模式。卡斯尔斯的论文被证明有两个部分：第一，“第四世界的福利”的论点，依靠对工人的保护;第二，强调社会政策的路径依赖性。完全有可能在不考虑第一个前提的情况下接受论证的第二个前提，而且确实有许多人这样做。也有可能接受工资水平保护问题在澳大利亚社会政策中的重要性，而不接受完整的第四世界论点。本文探讨了澳大利亚和新西兰的社会民主道路以及劳动力市场监管的持续重要性，并考虑这种强调在多大程度上仍然使澳大利亚的社会政策在现代具有独特性。论点的重点是与劳动力市场保护和工资有关的数据和政策，以及福利和社会保障制度，以及关于贫穷和不平等的比较资料。
In his celebrated work of comparative policy, Francis Castles argued that a radical wage-earning model of welfare had evolved in Australia and New Zealand over the course of the 20th century. The Castles' thesis is shown to have two parts: first, the ‘fourth world of welfare’ argument that rests upon protection of workers; and, second, an emphasis on the path-dependent nature of social policy. It is perfectly possible to accept the second premise of the argument without the first, and indeed many do so. It is also possible to accept the importance of wage level protection concerns in Australasian social policy without accepting the complete fourth world thesis. This article explores the path of social democracy in Australia and New Zealand and the continuing importance of labour market regulation, as well as considering the extent to which that emphasis still makes Australasian social policy distinctive in the modern age. The argument focuses on the data and policies relating to labour market protection and wages, as well the systems of welfare and social protection, and the comparative information on poverty and inequality.
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Ashton, T;Mays, N;Devlin, N
通讯作者：
Devlin, N