Stigmatized sources and persuasion: prejudice as a determinant of argument scrutiny.
Stigmatized sources and persuasion: prejudice as a determinant of argument scrutiny.
复制标题
污名化的来源和说服：偏见作为论证审查的决定因素。
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.76.1.19
复制
发表时间：
1999
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
White,PH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Petty,RE;Fleming,MA;White,PH
两个实验研究了几种解释的可行性，为什么大多数群体的个人过程中有说服力的信息，从污名化的来源比那些从nonstigmatized来源。在每项研究中。多数组参与者要么是高或低的偏见或高或低的矛盾心理对污名化的来源的群体暴露于一个有说服力的沟通归因于污名化（黑人，实验1;同性恋，实验2）或nonstigmatized（白色，实验1;异性恋，实验2）源。在这两项研究中，来源污名化只在那些对污名化群体偏见较低的人中增加了信息审查。这一发现与以下观点最为一致，即人们仔细审查来自污名化来源的信息，以防范自己或他人可能做出的不公平反应。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020阿帕，保留所有权利）
Two experiments examined the viability of several explanations for why majority group individuals process persuasive messages from stigmatized sources more than those from nonstigmatized sources. in each study. majority group participants who either were high or low in prejudice or were high or low in ambivalence toward a stigmatized source's group were exposed to a persuasive communication attributed to a stigmatized (Black, Experiment 1; homosexual, Experiment 2) or nonstigmatized (White, Experiment 1; heterosexual, Experiment 2) source. In both studies, source stigmatization increased message scrutiny only among those who were low in prejudice toward the stigmatized group. This finding is most consistent with the view that people scrutinize messages from stigmatized sources in order to guard against possibly unfair reactions by themselves or others.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)