Eating behavior and food purchases during the COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-sectional study among adults in the Netherlands.
Eating behavior and food purchases during the COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-sectional study among adults in the Netherlands.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.appet.2020.105002
复制
发表时间：
2021-02-01
期刊：
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
de Vet E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Poelman MP;Gillebaart M;Schlinkert C;Dijkstra SC;Derksen E;Mensink F;Hermans RCJ;Aardening P;de Ridder D;de Vet E
2020年3月15日，荷兰政府实施了新冠肺炎封锁措施。虽然实施了自我隔离和保持社交距离措施，但与其他几个国家相比，限制并不那么严格。本研究的目的是评估荷兰代表性成人样本（n = 1030）在封锁五周后饮食行为和食品购买的变化。结果显示，大多数参与者没有改变他们的饮食行为（83.0%）或食品购买（73.3%）。然而，在那些报告在封锁期间发生变化的人中，观察到社会人口统计学上的差异。例如，与体重健康的参与者相比，超重（OR = 2.26, 95%CI = 1.24-4.11）和肥胖（OR = 4.21, 95%CI = 2.13-8.32）的参与者更有可能表示在封锁期间吃得不健康。与受教育程度低的人相比，受教育程度高的人（OR = 2.25, 95%-CI = 1.03-4.93）在封锁期间也更有可能表示吃得不健康。与年轻的参与者相比，年龄较大的参与者更有可能表示他们的饮食行为没有差异，年轻的参与者更有可能表示他们在封锁期间吃得更健康（OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.01-1.04）和不健康（OR = 1.04, 95%CI = 1.02-1.06）。与体重健康的参与者相比，肥胖参与者更有可能表示在封锁期间购买更多的薯片/零食（OR = 2.79, 95%CI = 1.43-5.45）和更多的非酒精饮料（OR = 2.74, 95%CI = 1.36-5.50）。在以前使用过送餐服务的人中，174人（29.5%）表示在封锁期间更频繁地使用送餐服务。尽管结果证实了饮食习惯的持久性，但在那些报告发生变化的人群中，观察到深刻的社会人口统计学差异。特别是对于超重和肥胖的人来说，封锁已经对健康的饮食选择造成了影响。进一步的研究应该揭示这些观察的潜在机制。
On March 15, 2020, the Dutch Government implemented COVID-19 lockdown measures. Although self-quarantine and social-distancing measures were implemented, restrictions were less severe compared to several other countries. The aim of this study was to assess changes in eating behavior and food purchases among a representative adult sample in the Netherlands (n = 1030), five weeks into lockdown. The results show that most participants did not change their eating behaviors (83.0%) or food purchases (73.3%). However, socio-demographic differences were observed among those that reported changes during lockdown. For example, participants with overweight (OR = 2.26, 95%CI = 1.24–4.11) and obesity (OR = 4.21, 95%CI = 2.13–8.32) were more likely to indicate to eat unhealthier during lockdown compared to participants with a healthy weight. Those with a high educational level (OR = 2.25, 95%-CI = 1.03–4.93) were also more likely to indicate to eat unhealthier during lockdown compared to those with a low educational level. Older participants were more likely to indicate to experience no differences in their eating behaviors compared to those of younger age, who were more likely to indicate that they ate healthier (OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.01–1.04) as well as unhealthier (OR = 1.04, 95%CI = 1.02–1.06) during lockdown. Participants with obesity were more likely to indicate to purchase more chips/snacks (OR = 2.79, 95%CI = 1.43–5.45) and more nonalcoholic beverages (OR = 2.74, 95%CI = 1.36–5.50) during lockdown in comparison with those with a healthy weight. Of those that used meal delivery services before, 174 (29.5%) indicated to use meal delivery services more frequently during lockdown. Although the results confirm the persistence of dietary routines, profound socio-demographic differences were observed for those that did report changes. Especially for individuals with overweight and obesity, the lockdown has taken its toll on healthy dietary choices. Further research should unravel underlying mechanisms for these observations.