Clinical Outcome of Lesions With Discordant Results Among Different Invasive Physiologic Indices - Resting Distal Coronary to Aortic Pressure Ratio, Resting Full-Cycle Ratio, Diastolic Pressure Ratio, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio, and Fractional Flow Reserve -
Clinical Outcome of Lesions With Discordant Results Among Different Invasive Physiologic Indices - Resting Distal Coronary to Aortic Pressure Ratio, Resting Full-Cycle Ratio, Diastolic Pressure Ratio, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio, and Fractional Flow Reserve -
复制标题
DOI：
10.1253/circj.cj-19-0230
复制
发表时间：
2019-11-01
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Koo, Bon-Kwon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lee, Joo Myung;Rhee, Tae-Min;Koo, Bon-Kwon
背景资料：我们评估了静息和充血压力衍生的生理指标之间结果不一致的延迟病变的2年临床结局，包括静息远端主动脉冠状动脉压（静息Pd/Pa）、瞬时无波比率（iFR）、静息全周期比率（RFR）、舒张压比率（dPR）和血流储备分数（FFR）。根据4组分类，使用已知临界值（静息Pd/Pa）分析了具有可用静息Pd/Pa、iFR、RFR、dPR和FFR数据的1，024支血管（435例患者）的2年临床结局
Background: We evaluated the 2-year clinical outcomes of deferred lesions with discordant results between resting and hyperemic pressure-derived physiologic indices, including resting distal to aortic coronary pressure (resting Pd/Pa), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), diastolic pressure ratio (dPR), and fractional flow reserve (FFR).Methods and Results: The 2-year clinical outcomes of 1,024 vessels (435 patients) with available resting Pd/Pa, iFR, RFR, dPR, and FFR data were analyzed according to a 4-group classification using known cutoff values (resting Pd/Pa