Temporal overlap in the linguistic processing of successive words in reading: reply to Pollatsek, Reichle, and Rayner (2006a).
Temporal overlap in the linguistic processing of successive words in reading: reply to Pollatsek, Reichle, and Rayner (2006a).
复制标题
阅读中连续单词的语言处理中的时间重叠：回复 Pollatsek、Reichle 和 Rayner (2006a)。
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1490
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Eiter,Brianna
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Inhoff,AlbrechtW;Radach,Ralph;Eiter,Brianna
A. Pollatsek、艾德·赖希勒和K. Rayner（见记录2006-22004-014）认为，AW Inhoff，BM Eiter和R。Radach（见记录2005-13471-012）在一般协议的核心假设的顺序注意力转移模型，如果考虑额外的假设和事实。当前作者批判性地讨论了假设的处理时间线，并指出Pollatsek等人的成功。的模拟是基于一个严重低估的pretarget字的观看时间在Inhoff等人。和实际数据是很难调和的严格串行注意转移假设。作者还讨论了EZ Reader模型中的注意力转移和眼跳编程假设，并得出结论，这些假设与相关研究领域的研究不一致。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
A. Pollatsek, ED Reichle, and K. Rayner (see record 2006-22004-014) argue that the critical findings in AW Inhoff, BM Eiter, and R. Radach (see record 2005-13471-012) are in general agreement with core assumptions of sequential attention shift models if additional assumptions and facts are considered. The current authors critically discuss the hypothesized time line of processing and indicate that the success of Pollatsek et al.'s simulation is predicated on a gross underestimation of the pretarget word's viewing duration in Inhoff et al. and that the actual data are difficult to reconcile with the strictly serial attention shift assumption. The authors also discuss attention shifting and saccade programming assumptions in the EZ Reader model and conclude that these are not in harmony with research in related domains of study.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)