TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE IN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH
TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE IN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/h0020412
复制
发表时间：
1966-01-01
影响因子：
22.4
通讯作者：
BAKAN, D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BAKAN, D
显著性检验并不提供有关心理现象的信息，而这些心理现象正是显著性检验所特有的。与显着性检验的基本逻辑进行审查。零假设在任何情况下都是错误的。出版实践促进了对人群中微小影响的报告。心理学家通过曲解进行”调整”，将p值作为一种”度量”，假设显著性检验提供了推理的自动性，并将总体与总体混淆。困难的照明承担的贡献，从决策理论学校的费雪方法。贝叶斯方法的建议。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
The test of significance does not provide the information concerning psychological phenomena characteristically attributed to it; and a great deal of mischief has been associated with its use. The basic logic associated with the test of significance is reviewed. The null hypothesis is characteristically false under any circumstances. Publication practices foster the reporting of small effects in populations. Psychologists have" adjusted" by misinterpretation, taking the p value as a" measure," assuming that the test of significance provides automaticity of inference, and confusing the aggregate with the general. The difficulties are illuminated by bringing to bear the contributions from the decision-theory school on the Fisher approach. The Bayesian approach is suggested.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)