Monitoring acute equine visceral pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): A validation study
Monitoring acute equine visceral pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): A validation study
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.08.004
复制
发表时间：
2016-10-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
van Loon, Johannes P. A. M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
VanDierendonck, Machteld C.;van Loon, Johannes P. A. M.
本研究提出了两个最近描述的疼痛量表，马乌得勒支大学量表的复合疼痛评估（EQUUS-COMPASS）和马乌得勒支大学量表面部疼痛评估（EQUUS-FAP），在马急性绞痛的验证。对46匹成年马（n = 23匹急性绞痛马; n = 23匹健康对照马）进行了随访队列研究，以验证和完善构建的量表。两种疼痛量表均显示绞痛马与健康对照马之间以及可保守治疗的绞痛马与需要手术治疗或安乐死的绞痛马之间存在统计学显著差异。EQUUS-COMPASS（分别为87%和71%）和EQUUS-FAP（分别为77%和100%）的灵敏度和特异性均良好，并且对单个参数应用加权因子不会产生实质性影响。(C)2016由Elsevier Ltd.出版
This study presents the validation of two recently described pain scales, the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP), in horses with acute colic. A follow-up cohort study of 46 adult horses (n = 23 with acute colic; n = 23 healthy control horses) was performed for validation and refinement of the constructed scales. Both pain scales showed statistically significant differences between horses with colic and healthy control horses, and between horses with colic that could be treated conservatively and those that required surgical treatment or were euthanased. Sensitivity and specificity were good for both EQUUS-COMPASS (87% and 71%, respectively) and EQUUS-FAP (77% and 100%, respectively) and were not substantially influenced by applying weighting factors to the individual parameters. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.