Variability in the analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: The devil is in the detail

Variability in the analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: The devil is in the detail
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.cca.2012.04.003
复制
发表时间:
2012-08-16
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
Moniz, Cajetan F.
Moniz, Cajetan F.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Couchman, Lewis;Benton, Christopher M.;Moniz, Cajetan F.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:液相色谱串联质谱仪(LC-MS/MS)越来越多地应用于临床实验室中25-羟基维生素D(25OHD)的分析,但测定方法并不简单。重要的是。LC-MS/MS不是一种单一的技术:样品制备、层析和电离/裂解过程中的变量都应该被考虑。方法:我们分析了国际维生素D室内质量评估计划(DEQAS)组织的一项调查结果,以确定这些变量对两个DEQAS分布结果的影响。结果:65个实验室收回了问卷。346(57%)个人的结果来自使用电喷雾电离(ESI)的实验室,259个(43%)来自使用大气压化学电离(APCI)的实验室。两组的平均结果比差异无统计学意义(P=0.5828),但差异有统计学意义(P
Background: Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is increasingly used in clinical laboratories for the analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), but measurement is not straightforward. Importantly. LC-MS/MS is not a single technique: variables in sample preparation, chromatography and ionisation/fragmentation should each be considered.Methods: We analysed results from a survey organised by the international Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS), to determine the influence of such variables on the results for two DEQAS distributions.Results: 65 laboratories returned questionnaires. 346 (57%) individual results were from laboratories using electrospray ionisation (ESI), and 259 (43%) from laboratories using atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation (APCI). Although the mean ratio of results was not significantly different between ESI and APCI (P = 0.5828), there was greater variation (P