A comparison of consensus and nonconsensus approaches to modeling contraceptive choice behavior.
A comparison of consensus and nonconsensus approaches to modeling contraceptive choice behavior.
复制标题
避孕选择行为建模的共识和非共识方法的比较。
DOI：
10.1002/hec.723
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Chao,Li-Wei
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chao,Li-Wei
本文开发了一个更一般的避孕选择模型，考虑到避孕套和避孕药，在美国最常用的两种可逆避孕药之间的根本区别。避孕药产生单一的避孕产出，而避孕套则是一种投入，用于预防怀孕和疾病的联合生产。由于避孕套最终由男性使用，而避孕药由女性使用，因此非合作博弈理论被用来建模单独的男性和女性效用函数。使用Stackelberg和纳什作为解决方案的概念，计量经济学的规格推导和模型进行比较，来自家庭的共识模型的规格。同时行动纳什最好地描述了未婚和非同居性伴侣的行为，女性领导者Stackelberg优于已婚或同居伴侣的其他模型。版权所有© 2002年约翰威利父子有限公司。
This paper develops a more general model of contraceptive choice, taking into account a fundamental difference between the condom and the contraceptive pill, the two most commonly used reversible contraceptives in the US. The pill produces a single output of pregnancy prevention, but the condom is an input into a joint production for both pregnancy prevention and disease protection. Since the condom is ultimately used by the male, and the pill by the female, noncooperative game theory is used to model the separate male and female utility functions. Using both Stackelberg and Nash as solution concepts, econometric specifications are derived and the models are compared with the specifications derived from a consensus model of the household. Simultaneous‐move Nash best describes the behavior of unmarried and noncohabiting sexual partners, and female‐leader Stackelberg outperforms the other models for married or cohabiting couples. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.